Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Re-blog from the Guardian Online - The cost of historical research: why archives need to move with the times

The cost of historical research: why archives need to move with the times

The variable fees charged to access original documents risk putting archival research out of general reach, says Nell Darby.

Should researchers be charged additional fees to take photographs of archived material? Photograph: Uriel Sinai/Getty Images

As county archives face continued financial pressure on their services, history researchers are facing increasing difficulty in accessing original archival documents. Reduced and often complex opening arrangements, fewer staff and closures over lunch periods makes pre-planning an inevitable part of the archival research process.

Archives appear to be using fees to plug gaps in their finances – and these can often be idiosyncratic. Day passes are issued for users to photograph documents to transcribe later from home or university. These can vary in price from £2 at Birmingham to £25 at North Yorkshire County Record OfficeBerkshire Record Office charges £1 per image and for those needing access to long documents, the cost can become prohibitive. This includes me. I am researching 18th-century magistrates’ notebooks, which can run to hundreds of pages of dense text.

These fees matter. Archivists are not the only ones under financial pressure – researchers are too. Research students have limited budgets and are increasingly time-strapped. Transcribing documents in record offices is time consuming and taking photographs to access documents in our own time is invaluable. It means less time spent using record office resources, yet we are being charged inconsistent amounts to use our own cameras.

The costs and difficulties in accessing archival documents is having an impact on history researchers who may feel that it is too hard to access these documents, and instead rely on more limited sources or digitised resources. In doing so, they miss out on a wealth of information and the quality of research suffers.

I raised this subject on Twitter where it received a significant response among professional researchers, academics and students. My own supervisor at the University of Northampton, Drew Gray, criticised the charges at Berkshire Record Office, pointing out that “even the British Library’s copying service is better value”.

Gray added: “There should be a standard charge and it should be fair and reflect costs, otherwise it penalises researchers without considerable funding behind them, which is elitist.” This was also a point raised by Cathryn Pearce of Greenwich Maritime Institute, who argued that it was “very elitist to only allow the rich or funded to take photos for research. Many of us doing good work … can’t afford that”.

Louise Falcini, an 18th-century historian based at the University of Reading, pointed out that the National Archives allows all researchers to photograph documents for free. She said: “I took almost 500 photographs at the National Archives – all for research purposes. £500 wouldn’t have been an option.”

Lucy Bailey, another PhD student at the University of Northampton, had hoped to photograph a Victorian shop account book on her visit to Berkshire Record Office, in order to transcribe it in her own time from home. Surprised at the £1 per image cost, Bailey queried the reasoning behind it with a county archivist who responded: “We charge a unit rate rather than a daily rate simply because we believe that it better reflects what a user is acquiring. It seems to us analogous to making printouts from microfilm or from a digitised image and to the supply of photocopies, where the charge is directly related to the number of copies supplied.”

What Berkshire’s price structure fails to recognises that a researcher photographing documents costs the archive less than if they requested copies or spent days sitting in the archive transcribing material. Using your own camera and asking an archivist to photocopy documents are simply not analogous.

A survey conducted by Lucy Bailey looking at self-service photography costs levied by county archives across England, showed a striking lack of consistency. Hampshire Archives charge £12.50 for a daily camera pass, and East Sussex £15, second only to North Yorkshire’s £25. Conversely,Herefordshire ArchivesDevon Heritage Centre and North Devon Record Office charge only £3 per day. Yet some other regional archives, including Northumberland and North East Lincolnshire, continue to let researchers photograph documents for free.

Archivists argue that photograph fees should be seen as separate to research fees – one pointed out on Twitter that “research is still free even when photography is not”. Luci Gosling, historical specialist for theMary Evans Picture Library, says researchers should bear in mind that many archive charges are funnelled back into maintaining or improving the resources or facilities of the archive itself.

It is the age of the digital historian. Technology gives researchers the means of carrying out their work more effectively and quickly, and archivists need to respond positively to these changes. Without encouraging researchers to use and disseminate their material, archive buildings risk becoming populated only by those with the incomes to be able to indulge in research – and we will all be poorer for it.

Nell Darby is a doctoral research student in history at the University of Northampton – follow her on Twitter @nelldarby

This content is brought to you by Guardian Professional. To get more articles like this direct to your inbox, become a member ofthe Higher Education Network.

 

Reblogged from UKHRG - UK Heritage Research Group:

Envisioning the library of the future
Arts Council England, May 2013

Envisioning the library of the future, a major research project undertaken over the past year, has been published. The research will help library staff, funders and users to better understand what libraries could and should look like in the future.
Valued services: The research has found that public libraries are trusted spaces, open to all, in which people continue to explore and share the joys of reading, information, knowledge and culture.

Read more… 81 more words

Members of the East African Legislative Assembly (EALA) yesterday passed a motion condemning the UN system for failing “to prevent the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi despite having received reports to that effect.”

The motion, moved by MP Abubakar Zein Abubakar [Kenya], also declared the Assembly’s support for “the decision of the Council of Ministers to ensure that all the archives of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR ) be transferred to Rwanda.”

While addressing the lawmakers on Tuesday, President Paul Kagame, called for deepening of regional integration across Africa to boost the continent’s ability to stand for its rights.

Yesterday’s sitting was the actual plenary business for the fifth meeting of the first session of the third Assembly that runs from Tuesday until April 26 in Kigali.

The motion was seconded by MP Abubakar Ogle [Kenya], before it got the House’s unanimous approval.

Apart from expressing profound disappointment with the failure of the UN to prevent the Genocide, EALA declared “its solidarity with the people and Government of Rwanda especially now when they are commemorating the 1994 Genocide.

The Assembly appreciates the resilience of the people and Government of the Republic of Rwanda in copying with the legacy of Genocide on their own for the last 19 years, the legislators said in a statement.

The resolution demands the Council of Ministers to designate April 7 of every year as the EAC Day of Reflection on the Genocide against the Tutsi.

It calls on EAC Partner States to commemorate the Genocide; and act in accordance with the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of genocide by putting in place necessary mechanisms to track and bring Genocide fugitives to justice.

In addition, it calls on the EAC to enact laws punishing and negating the crime of genocide denial and propagating hate speeches embodying genocide ideology.

The resolution calls upon the EAC Summit (of Heads of State) to urge the UN to adopt a Resolution establishing an International Trust Fund for Survivors of the Genocide against the Tutsi and that the EAC do organise a Regional Conference to address the issues of Genocide as part of the 20th commemoration of the Genocide, next year.

via allAfrica.com: Rwanda: EALA Backs Rwanda’s Quest for ICTR Archives (Page 1 of 2).

via allAfrica.com: Rwanda: EALA Backs Rwanda’s Quest for ICTR Archives (Page 1 of 2).

On Wednesday East African Legislative Assembly (EALA) parliamentarians passed a motion declaring their institution’s support for the decision of the Council of Ministers to ensure that all the archives of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) be transferred to Rwanda.

It is extremely unfortunate and frustrating that Rwandans are still being forced to agitate for this essential part of our own history. Make no mistake; those archives are our history.

They document the planning, execution and aftermath of the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi. They reveal the legal process in which the architects of the more than a million deaths faced justice.

They document the crimes that monsters like genocidal regime Prime Minister Jean Kambanda, Jean Paul Akayesu and the virulent Theoneste Bagosora committed.

It is simply mind-boggling that the archives would find another home. Where else would they be as valued? Where else would they provide such a lesson to the citizenry?

Placing the archives in any other hands would be a slap in the face of all Rwandans. The EALA realises this and so does the East African Community. The United Nations system must not betray Rwandans the way it did 19 years ago.

via allAfrica.com: East Africa: The ICTR Archives Belong to Rwandans.

via allAfrica.com: East Africa: The ICTR Archives Belong to Rwandans.

Reblogged from Refugee Archives Blog:

News release from The National Archives:

We are working with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) to transfer and begin releasing colonial administration records, referred to as the 'migrated archives' between April 2012 and November 2013. This is in accordance with FCO's published timeline on GOV.UK

The fifth tranche will be made available in the reading rooms at The National Archives from Friday 26 April 2013.

Read more… 137 more words

The following title has recently been published by Facet:

 

Preserving Archives, 2nd edition

Helen Forde and Jonathan Rhys-Lewis

 

This is a brand new and fully updated edition of this seminal work on archival preservation.

Archivists in all types of organizations face questions on how to plan a preservation strategy in less than perfect circumstances, or deal with a sudden emergency. This book considers the causes of threats to the basic material, outlines the preservation options available and offers flexible solutions applicable in a variety of situations.  It offers a wide range of case studies and examples from international specialists. This revised edition includes additional material on digital preservation and green building as well as a new chapter on the management and training of volunteers, reflecting a key concern for many archival institutions.

Table of contents (PDF): http://www.facetpublishing.co.uk/downloads/file/forde-toc.pdf

Sample chapter (PDF): http://www.facetpublishing.co.uk/downloads/file/forde-ch1.pdf

More information: http://www.facetpublishing.co.uk/title.php?id=8231

 

Blog Posting originally published on the Voluntary Action and History Society (VAHS) Blog at:  http://www.vahs.org.uk/2013/04/the-campaign-goes-on/

The Campaign goes on

Posted on April 10, 2013 by Georgina Brewis

Readers of this blog may have noticed a recent rare good news story in the press about charity archives. After several years of protracted negotiation, the records of leading development organisation Oxfam are to be donated to the Bodleian Library in Oxford, thanks to a major cataloguing grant from the Wellcome Trust.

This is excellent news, and we hope there is more to come. Following a successful launch at the House of Lords in October 2012, the Campaign for Voluntary Sector Archives published its first draft guidance in March. The Keeping it Simple guide, aimed at small voluntary organisations, was put together by Co-ordinating Editor Philip Gale of The National Archives, with the input of voluntary organisations, historians and archivists. This is the first of what the Campaign intends as a series of documents offering practical advice to the creators and users of archives of the voluntary sector. Please do submit your comments on this guidance by 1 June 2013.

The ARA’s Archive Volunteering Award 2013 also presents a chance to recognise the contribution of volunteers to the charity archive sector. Last year the award was won by Wolverhampton City Archives, but leading charity archive WRVS received a special ‘highly commended’ award, designed to recognise the immense work of its volunteers in sorting, cataloguing and digitising its collection, enabling the re-opening of the enquiry service and launch of an online catalogue in January 2013. Perhaps a voluntary sector archive could win this year? Nominations close on 7 June 2013. In another coup for charity archives, the Planned Environment Therapy Trust Archive and Study Centre has been named Family History Magazine’s ‘Archive of the Year’.

Since its launch the Campaign has made contact with a number of interested parties in England, as well as in Canada, Australia and Northern Ireland who are similarly concerned with the plight of the records of charities, voluntary organisations and pressure groups. Meanwhile, working with members of the Campaign, the VAHS New Researchers Group is planning a workshop on using the archives and records of voluntary organisations later this year. Watch this space for more information.

Do you have a good news story about voluntary sector archives you’d like to share? Or a tale of a charity’s records under threat? The Campaign for Voluntary Sector Archives is keen to involve a greater range of stakeholders, so do get in touch.

The British Records Association:

 

 ‘ARCHIVES AT RISK’: SEMINAR AT THE BRITISH LIBRARY, WEDNESDAY 8 MAY 2013, 2-4.45pm

 

The British Records Association is holding an afternoon seminar (1.30pm for 2pm) on its recently published report about risks currently threatening historical records and archives.  For details of the report please go to http://www.britishrecordsassociation.org.uk/pages/news.htm

 

The purpose of the seminar is to consider the issues raised by the report and the actions needed to tackle them.  The report highlighted generic risks and made a variety of proposals for further co-ordinated work to enhance the collection and preservation of both digital and traditional archive formats.  Short presentations will be given by Anthony Smith (British Records Association), Caroline Peach (British Library Preservation Advisory Centre), Melinda Haunton (The National Archives) and David Mander (Independent Consultant).

 

There will be plenty of opportunity for questions about the report as well as wider discussion on the feasibility of the proposals.  This event will be of interest to anyone who is concerned about current strategic and practical issues facing the proper preservation of the UK’s rich archival heritage and the variety of archive services that contribute to managing that heritage.

 

We would like the afternoon to provide the basis for an action plan and are very keen to make use of the occasion to hear from anyone who would be willing to address the issues raised by the report.

 

Attendance at the seminar is free and light refreshments will be provided on arrival, but places are limited.  Please book your place by contacting Maria Evans, British Records Association, Finsbury Library, 245 St John’s Street, London EC1V 4NB (info@britishrecordsassociation.org.uk; 0207 8330428) before Thursday 2 May 2013.

 

The Association welcomes constructive feedback and comment from readers of its report.  If you wish to comment on it, please contact the Chairman of the Association’s Records Preservation Section at rps@britishrecordsassociation.org.uk

 

Annual Conference

“Community as Archives, Archives as Community

ACA’s 38th Annual Conference – June 13-15, 2013 – Delta Winnipeg Hotel, Winnipeg, MB

Communities are the framework of our identities, our history and our lives. Online and offline, connected by geography, ethnicity, language, sexuality, interests, professions, friendship and kin, our lives are a lattice of communities.

Join us in Winnipeg, a city of communities and meeting places, for an exploration of how archival consciousness arises in communities and how community consciousness has arisen among archivists.

This year’s conference not only promises a thoroughly stimulating and engaging program, but also offers opportunities to join colleagues in experiencing Winnipeg’s irrepressible community spirit.  Social events will highlight a few of the unique eccentricities, charms, and attractions of Winnipeg and surrounding area.  Or you can explore what the city has to offer on your own!

ACA 2013 will allow you to be connected to the conference and your colleagues like never before, through Facebook, Twitter, and the ACA website.  And the ACA 2013 app will ensure that you have all the conference information you require no matter where you and your mobile device may be.

The ACA 2013 conference hotel is the Delta Winnipeg.  Among its many features are a central location in downtown Winnipeg within walking distance of many of the city’s attractions, a rooftop pool, excellent dining, a fantastic lounge, and strong Wi-Fi throughout the guest rooms and conference facilities.

The Call for Student Papers and a Call for Poster Submissions are now closed.

The preliminary 2013 Conference at a Glance is now available.  Conference information appears on the pages/screens in this section while additional information will be added as the sessions and social activities are developed and confirmed. See What’s New and Important Dates for more information.

Click this link for information about Past Conferences.  Proceedings from recent ACA Conferences are available in the Members’ Only area.

We look forward to you joining us in Winnipeg for ACA 2013!

Reblogged from Refugee Archives Blog:

Click to visit the original post

From the Institute of Race Relations:

Why the voluntary sector is under threat

Written by Jenny Bourne

A report into the independence of the voluntary sector holds important lessons for groups struggling for funding and their very existence.

The voluntary sector is under threat. So, who cares, you might reply, everything is up for grabs these days. It is not enough to throw up ones hands and see the demise of the Third Sector as inevitable or unimportant or nothing to do with politics.

Read more… 83 more words

Reblogged from Refugee Archives Blog:

Re-blogged from the Voluntary Action History Society:

The symbiotic relationship between the humanitarian sector and those who document its work is by no means an easy one. This point seems likely to be made again with Fatal Assistance, a documentary by Raoul Peck due to screen in London on Saturday as part of the Human Rights Watch film festival…

Read more… 481 more words

I am writing to remind everyone about the workshop and lecture on 8 March 2013 by Professor Maria Tamboukou from the Centre for Narrative Research, University of East London.

If you would like more information about these events, please email novella@ioe.ac.uk.  If you would like to book onto either the workshop or lecture, please click on the web links below.

 

The thick autonomy of archival research (Workshop, 1-4pm)
Room G16, 9-11 Endsleigh Gardens In recent years archival research in the social sciences is emerging as a vibrant field of qualitative research, but despite a relatively small body of literature that has been slowly amassing around it (see Stanley 2011, Valles et al 2011), it still remains a relatively underdeveloped field outside the humanities. In this workshop we will look into questions of archival sensibility in social sciences research and explore a range of methodological approaches, epistemological standpoints and concerns, as well as theoretical questions and issues.

Drawing on Casey’s influential suggestion about the ‘thick autonomy of memory’ (2000) the archive is configured not just as a discursively constructed memory space, but also as a material assemblage, a laboratory of memory with specific spatio/temporal rhythms that significantly influence mnemonic practices in the study and writing of memory. The workshop will draw on specific case studies from archival research that Professor Maria Tamboukou has conducted in a number of archives in the UK and abroad over the last ten years, informed by neo-materialist approaches in feminist science studies. (see Tamboukou 2010)

http://store.ioe.ac.uk/browse/extra_info.asp?compid=1&modid=2&prodid=147&deptid=112&catid=42

 

Gendering the memory of work (Lecture, 5-7pm)
Drama Studio, Institute of Education

 

Over the past thirty years feminist theorists have drawn on women’s auto/biographical narratives to include them in the canonical texts of literary criticism, to rewrite social and cultural histories but also to understand and theorise the constitution of the gendered self in modernity. But if one looks into the rich body of scholarship around women’s auto/biographical narratives, there is very little theorisation on working women’s auto/biographies from a sociological perspective, although there is a substantial body of work in literary criticism (see Coiner 1995, Zandy1990). Even among the few notable exceptions (Hollis 2004, Stanley 1984, Swindells 1995) the seamstress seems to be a figure that has yet to be studied and analysed. It seems that working women in general and seamstresses in particular had very little time in their hands to write but did they really?

Professor Maria Tamboukou’s review of the literature has revealed a range of very interesting autobiographical documents that span diverse geographical, ethnic, racial and cultural backgrounds To be sure, seamstresses’ narratives or rather extracts of them have been widely used as illustrations and points of reference for many studies around women’s work in a wide range of disciplinary fields. However seamstresses’ narratives have never been analysed as ‘documents of life’ (Plummer 2001). It is this significant gap in the literature on women’s lives that Tamboukou’s research addresses, particularly focusing on the memory of work and its role in the constitution of female subjectivities. In this lecture Professor Tamboukou will present some of the emergent themes as well as a tentative framework for theorising gendered aspects in the memory of work.

http://store.ioe.ac.uk/browse/extra_info.asp?compid=1&modid=2&prodid=146&deptid=112&catid=42

 

Reblogged from UCA Archives:

Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post

On the 16th February 2013 at the London Metropolitan archives LGBT conference, held at the stunning architectural and design surroundings of Guildhall, UCA Archives presented the Tessa Boffin archive, a Photographer specialising in LGBT issues including cross dressing,which looks at gender identity, and photographic responses to AIDS, alongside professional Photographer, Rebecca Andrews', recen, around 2000, female body builder images. Andrews also looked at ways that gender identity can be portrayed (looking at Tessa Boffin's 1980s archive and her own recent body builder work)

Read more… 73 more words

Reblogged from Brunel Special Collections:

Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post

A guest post by Dr Claire Lynch.

As a researcher I’ve spent many happy hours, elbow deep in the manuscripts of the
Burnett Archive of Working Class Autobiography held here at Brunel. The archive contains over 230 autobiographies by authors born between 1790 and 1945 and
was compiled by John Burnett, David Vincent, and David Mayall. They were
interested in how working class people had written about their own lives and the…

Read more… 436 more words

Cartoon by Sally Wesley c.1770 showing parishioners attending church © John Rylands Library. Reproduced by courtesy of the University Librarian and Director, The John Rylands University Library, The University of Manchester.

Cartoon by Sally Wesley c.1770 showing parishioners attending church © John Rylands Library. Reproduced by courtesy of the University Librarian and Director, The John Rylands University Library, The University of Manchester.

A programme is now available below for our 2013 conference. The cost of the day is £45 including lunch and coffee.

Booking form is available here: RAG Booking Form 2013. Please complete and return this as soon as possible if you would like to attend and certainly by 10 April 2013

RAG Conference 2013: Localism in Religious Archives

London Metropolitan Archives, Friday 26 April 2013

10:20 Registration

10:40 Welcome

10:50 The Archives of the East London Mosque Jamil Sherif, Archivist, East London Mosque

11:25 Coffee

11:45 Using London’s Religious Collections: A Researcher’s Perspective Sarah Flew, The Open University

12:20 Archives of London’s Jewish Organisations Charles Tucker, Record Keeper, United Synagogue

13:00 Lunch

13:45 RAG AGM

14:30 Building Archive Facilities at Exeter Cathedral: Options, Appraisal, Decisions and Practicalities Ann Barwood, Canon Librarian and Ellie Jones, Archivist, Exeter Cathedral

15:15 The Cwm Jesuit Library Project Hannah Thomas, Swansea University

15:50 Wrap up

16:00 Close

 

From SCOLMA (UK Libraries & Archives Group on Africa) website:

March 4, 2013, 1-2pm, Senate House, 4th Floor

The challenge of the traditional collection and the possibilities of “Tribing and Untribing the Archive: the Material Record of the Thukela-Mzimkulu Region, c. 1750-1910″

A seminar by Nessa Liebhammer

BOOKING ESSENTIAL – contact daniel.gilfoyle@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

Nessa Liebhammer discusses a collaborative project between the Archive and Public Culture Research Initiative at the University of Cape Town (APC) and the Johannesburg Art Gallery, which is the pilot of a larger project Ethnologised Pasts and their Archival Futures, launched by the APC.

Museum and art gallery displays, and colonial and apartheid knowledge activities, are one aspect with which the project is concerned. It aims to draw attention to the archival capacities and challenges of ethnographic material and to enable ongoing recuperation of pasts denied by colonialism and apartheid. The pilot takes as its focus the material culture of Thukela-Mzimkulu region, c 1750 – 1910. It calls into being an expanded archive for that period, and accounts for its historical disavowal.

Nessa Leibhammer is the curator of the Traditional Southern African Art at the Johannesburg Art Gallery, an Honorary Research Fellow of the University of Cape Town and currently a Visiting Research Fellow at the Centre for African Studies, Cambridge University.

 

ICA Annual Conference Brussels, 23-24 November 2013 “Accountability, Transparency and Access to Information”

It is time for the International Council on Archives to hold a high quality conference on records and information management issues.

Current trends such as the Open Government Partnership and the Open Data movement, combined with the on-going challenges and opportunities offered by modern technology mean that all areas of government and society, whether they know it or not, are considering recordkeeping issues. ICA’s first ever Annual Conference, “Accountability, Transparency and Access to Information” aims to tackle these issues from the bottom up and the top down, from practical solution-based case-studies, through international and collaborative case studies to high level government and international initiatives.

The programme themes include:

1. Citizens engaging with government, archives and history

2. Records providing evidence of rights

3. Legal issues

4. Role/contribution of archivists and records managers in/to accountability, transparency and access to information:

5. Initiatives:

6. Delivering access

7. Records Management
The 2013 Programme Committee is looking for relevant papers from good speakers who can provoke the ICA community and its wider stakeholders to reflect on and debate these very real challenges.

All information and submission documents can be found there:

http://icarchives.webbler.co.uk/?lid=13986&bid=1085

Contact the list owner for assistance at ARCHIVES-NRA-request@JISCMAIL.AC.UK

For information about joining, leaving and suspending mail (eg during a holiday) see the list website at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=archives-nra

 

Reblogged from UCA Archives:

Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post


UCA Archives and UCA Photography graduate, Rebecca Andrews, will feature in the 10th Archives LGBT conference, held at Guildhall Library on the 16th February.

UCA Archives will showcase the Tessa Boffin Archive in a display. The archive is currently held at Maidstone campus.

Tessa Boffin was a lesbian photographer, writer, curator and performance artist. She studied photography in the 1980s at Polytechnic of Central London, and her work involved sex and sexual fantasy, where she explored issues such as transvestism, homosexuality and lesbianism.

Read more… 285 more words

*** Apologies for Cross Posting ***

Tackling Human Trafficking in Europe: Prevention, Protection, Prosecution The Silken Berlaymont Hotel, Brussels, Wednesday 30th January 2013

Human trafficking is an increasingly disturbing phenomenon in Europe with terrible consequences for victims, the majority of whom are forced into prostitution, street crime, domestic servitude and other forms of labour exploitation.

The recently adopted EU Strategy towards the Eradication of Trafficking in Human Beings 2012-2016 sets out concrete and practical measures to be implemented over the next five years, placing victims at the forefront.

This special International Symposium will facilitate policy discussion and provide a timely opportunity to explore comprehensive and integrated solutions to fighting the ‘hidden’ crime of human trafficking.

For further details, please visit http://publicpolicyexchange.co.uk/events/DA30-PPE2.php . Do feel free to circulate this information to relevant colleagues within your organisation.

In the meantime, to ensure your organisation is represented, please book online at https://bookings.publicpolicyexchange.co.uk/bookings/book.php?event=DA30-PPE2 at your earliest convenience in order to secure your delegate place(s).

Kind regards,

Alexandra Kelly

Public Policy Exchange

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Note: The material contained in this communication comes to you from the Forced Migration Discussion List which is moderated by Forced Migration Online, Refugee Studies Centre (RSC), Oxford Department of International Development, University of Oxford. It does not necessarily reflect the views of the RSC or the University. If you re-print, copy, archive or re-post this message please retain this disclaimer. Quotations or extracts should include attribution to the original sources.

 

E-mail: fmlist@qeh.ox.ac.uk

Posting guidelines: http://www.forcedmigration.org/research-resources/discussion/forced-migration-discussion-list-posting-guidelines

Subscribe/unsubscribe: http://tinyurl.com/fmlist-join-leave

List Archives: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/forced-migration.html

RSS: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?RSS&L=forced-migration

Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/refugeestudies

*** Apologies for Cross Posting ***

Equalities in Education – the new landscape Principles, challenges and ways ahead

Date: 28th January 2013

Venue: Institute of Education, Jeffery Hall, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL

Full details of programme, pricing and booking at at the conference website:

www.educationconference.org.uk
See also the publicity and booking form – [Available to Download Here]

 

Most schools throughout the UK are committed to reducing inequalities related to disability, ethnicity, faith, gender, sexual identity and social class. Their longstanding commitments have been supported and strengthened by the general and specific duties placed on all public authorities by the Equality Act 2010; the 2012 Ofsted framework; the targeted funding provided by the pupil premium grant, and the report of the Children’s Commissioner in England on school exclusions.

This conference will

• explore the implications of new legislation and funding for schools

• show how schools can illustrate the impact of intervention intended to raise attainment

• promote practical and strategic school leadership which is likely to be recognised as outstanding in a section 5 inspection (Framework for School Inspections: September 2012)

 

Who will benefit?

This conference is intended for senior leaders and teachers in all kinds of school, and for those who advise and support them. Participants are welcome from outside London as well as from within. The Equality Act 2010 charges schools with an expanded public sector equality duty. The focus has shifted from bureaucracy to outcomes in tackling unfairness and disadvantage. Schools are now required to publish equalities objectives and information which shows improved outcomes.

DfE statistics consistently show that the attainment levels of pupils from low-income backgrounds are well below national averages and are more likely than their peers to be persistently absent from school. Pupil Premium Grant funding has been provided to help schools close the attainment gap between these pupils and others. How have successful schools responded? Excellence in equalities is the hallmark of outstanding schools, colleges and local authorities throughout London. This conference will share excellent practice in closing the attainment gap.

Workshops will be led by experts and there will be opportunities for specialist networking. Practical case studies will be drawn from within the Greater London area. Participants will receive a resource pack designed to be useful reference material after the conference is over.

London Education Associates Foundation is a non-profit-making, non-political and faith-neutral organisation whose priorities and support for schools will withstand changes of central government. The object of LEA Foundation is to help schools break the link between poverty and low achievement. LEA Foundation offers a strategic framework for supporting school improvement throughout Greater London.

*** Apologies for Cross Posting ***

Call for papers: British Library Preservation Advisory Centre Conference October 2013

 

Evolution or revolution? The changing face of collection care.

Are changes in the way content is created, acquired and used encouraging collection care departments to adapt their approach – or demanding it?

Venue: British Library, London

Date: 14-15 October 2013

 

The British Library Preservation Advisory Centre, in consultation with IFLA, is hosting a two day conference in October 2013 examining the nature and perception of the collection care department in the modern and increasingly digital environment. In particular, are the career paths of collection care practitioners sign-posted well enough to attract the right skills and offer the right opportunities to develop, lead and engage?

Collection care departments are operating in increasingly dynamic environments – not only in respect of resources, but also of technology, information, learning and publishing. Technology is constantly defining and re-defining trends in information and content – what is created and how; how it is acquired; and how it can be accessed and experienced.

For collection care departments, there are new technologies to understand, new risks and benefits to be weighed up, new approaches to be learned; and yet there remain vast, physical collections to be protected, preserved and cared for.

We invite you to join us to discuss the effect of such changes on collection care strategy and practice – now and in the future. What does an effective collection care department actually look like in an increasingly digital environment? What is its purpose, its responsibilities; its business model? Does this represent an evolution or a revolution in practice?

And what is the impact on the individual working in collection care? Do we have enough of the right skills in the right places? Are we managing the expectations of students coming into the profession adequately?

In this context has the role of the conservator changed? If not, does it need to?

What does the term ‘conservator’ actually mean?  Have we come to accept it as a term which identifies and defines an individual with a specific practical skill and nothing more; and is that enough? Or is the modern conservator equipped with other skills – as well as or instead of the traditional bench skills?

In addition to invited speakers, we are calling for papers in two areas. The first area explores high-level perspectives on future approaches to collection care; and the second examines the skills present in today’s collection care departments and how they have developed and are deployed

 

1. The collection care department of tomorrow Your paper should discuss, from a strategic point of view, the collection care department of tomorrow, considering any of the following issues:

 

•     the relationship between conservation, preservation and digital preservation

•     the balance between single-item conservation  and larger/mass treatments or projects

•     the skills that are needed

•     the research agenda

•     business models

•     demonstrating impact

•     public engagement

 

2. The collection care practitioners of today Do you currently work in collection care? In the context of an evolution or revolution in practice, your paper might discuss and explore your role, considering any of the following issues

 

•     What type of training did you undertake and in what format (may or may not be collection care or conservation specific)

•     Are you working in collection care disciplines now that are relevant to your training?

•     Have your responsibilities changed to cover other aspects of collection care?

•     Does your current job in collection care meet the expectations you had when you trained?

•     Does the work you do define/identify you specifically as a conservator; or do you view yourself as a collection care practitioner with a specific skill?

•     How relevant are your skills to collection care?

•     How do you see your role developing?

 

Important Information

1.    Abstracts must be 250-300 words in length

2.    Abstracts should be submitted as an email attachment to sandy.ryan@bl.uk

3.    Abstracts should contain

•     area of discussion (1 or 2)

•     full title

•     author information – name, position, institution and email contact

4.    The deadline for the submission of abstracts is February 28th 2013

5.    You will be notified by March 22nd 2013 if your submission has been successful or not

6.    If your submission is accepted, you will be directed at the time of notification  to full terms and conditions for presenting at the conference, but please note in the meantime that presentations are expected to last for approximately 20 minutes long and must be made freely available on the British Library website after the conference

7.    Conference registration will open in May 2013

 

Caroline Peach

Head of Preservation Advisory Centre

The British Library

96 Euston Road

London NW1 2DB

www.bl.uk/blpac

 

Contact the list owner for assistance at ARCHIVES-NRA-request@JISCMAIL.AC.UK

 

For information about joining, leaving and suspending mail (eg during a holiday) see the list website at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=archives-nra

*** Apologies for Cross Posting ***

Dear colleagues:

The Section on University and Research Institution Archives (SUV) of the International Council on Archives will hold its 2013 conference from June 26-29 on the Caribbean island of Barbados. Hosted by the West Indies Federal Archives Centre of The University of the West Indies (UWI) at Cave Hill Campus, the conference will explore the theme of The New Age Archivist: Managing Records and Archives in a Digital World.

This Conference will provide a forum for archivists and other information professionals to investigate and discuss new trends in digitisation, electronic records and the Web. Speakers will assess the impact of the digital age on the appraisal, acquisition, storage, arrangement and description and the provision of access to the archives of universities and research institutions. Within this broad theme, archivists and information professionals will also examine the use of the “cloud,” social media and other online communities to create more meaningful interaction with users and potential users. It will also encourage debate on whether or to what extent archivists should seize the opportunity to use new modes of communication and outreach.

The Programme Committee for the 2013 SUV conference invites proposals for papers addressing the conference theme. The deadline for submitting proposals for individual papers or panel sessions is 15 January 2013 and proposers will receive a decision on the acceptance of their paper by 15 February 2013. Proposals should be submitted to the ICA SUV 2013 Conference Programme Committee Chair via e-mail at:  szary@email.unc.edu

The full call for proposals with full details is below. Please direct any questions about proposals to Richard Szary, chair of the Programme Committee, at szary@email.unc.edu

 

…………………………………………………………………

 

CALL FOR PAPERS

The Programme Committee of the ICA SUV is pleased to announce its Call for Papers for the 2013 Meeting which will be held in the Caribbean island of Barbados.

The West Indies Federal Archives Centre of The University of the West Indies (UWI) at Cave Hill Campus are honoured to host the 2013 meeting of the International Council on Archives – Section on University and Research Institution Archives (SUV). The planned duration of the Conference is four (4) days (inclusive of a one-day sightseeing heritage tour of the island, guided by Professor Karl Watson – Chair of the Barbados National Trust) from June 26th to 29th 2013.

THEME

The theme for the Conference is: The New Age Archivist: Managing Records and Archives in a Digital World.

 

This Conference will provide a forum for archivists and other information professionals to investigate and discuss new trends in digitisation, electronic records and the Web. Speakers will assess the impact of the digital age on the appraisal, acquisition, storage, arrangement and description and the provision of access to the archives of universities and research institutions. Within this broad theme, archivists and information professionals will also examine the use of the “cloud,” social media and other online communities to create more meaningful interaction with users and potential users. It will also encourage debate on whether or to what extent archivists should seize the opportunity to use new modes of communication and outreach.

 

KEYNOTE SPEAKERS

·        Sir Hilary Beckles – Historian – Principal and Pro-Vice Chancellor – The UWI

·        Henry Fraser – Professor Emeritus – Past President of the Barbados National Trust

·        Luciana Duranti – Professor and Chair of Archives Studies – University of British Columbia, School of Library, Archival & Information Studies (Canada)

·        Ken Thibodeau – National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.)

 

Sub-themes that may be addressed are wide and open, but an advanced academic level of discourse is required. Proposals should be analytical, not descriptive, and should reflect the changing nature of the archival enterprise in a digital world. Inter alia, papers within the following sub-themes will be welcomed:

 

·        Challenges and Opportunities for Archives & Research Institutions in a Web Environment

·        The Role of Social Network Tools in promoting Archives and Research

·        Issues associated with Archives and Information Institutions adopting social Network tools

·        “Cloud” Storage – A Place for Archives and Research Institutions?

·        Current Usage of Web Applications in Universities and Research Institutions

·        The Web: “Breathing New Life” into University Archives and Research Institutions

·        Aligning Strategic Institutional Goals with a Web Presence

·        Coping with Reformatting Technologies in the Information World

·        Use of Emerging technologies in Information and Knowledge Management

 

Proposal Submission Guidelines

Panels of up to three speakers, or individual presentations, on the themes above are welcome. Submissions should include the speaker’s name(s), affiliation, postal address, e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers, a short one-paragraph biographical note, the title of the paper, and a synopsis of approximately 250- 300 words. If you are submitting a proposal for a complete panel session, please provide a description of 250-300 words for the session as a whole in addition to a synopsis for each presentation. Presentations should aim to last for a maximum of 20 minutes (sessions of three speakers should last for no more than 1.5 hours – three 20 minute papers plus discussion). Each synopsis will be reviewed by the Programme Review Committee and presenters of papers accepted will be notified by February 15th, 2013.

 

For a description of the process and the criteria which will be used to review proposals, see “Annual Conference Review Committee Guidelines” available at: www.library.illinois.edu/ica-suv/ReviewCommGuidelines.php

Should you have any questions, please contact:

Richard SZARY, Programme Committee Chair

Louis Round Wilson Library

CB #3908

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514, United States

tel. 1 919 962-8125 – fax: 1 919 843-3480

e-mail: szary@email.unc.edu

 

Important Deadline Dates:

Abstracts submission: 15th January 2013

Notification of acceptance of abstracts: 15th February 2013

Abstracts should be submitted to the ICA SUV 2013 Conference Programme Committee Chair via e-mail at:  szary@email.unc.edu

Conference Programme Committee

Richard Szary (szary@email.unc.edu)

Sharon Alexander-Gooding, The UWI, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados and Local Chair (sharon.alexander-gooding@cavehill.uwi.edu)

John Aarons – The UWI University Archivist, Jamaica (john.aarons@uwimona.edu.jm)

Cherri-Ann Beckles The UWI-Federal Archives Centre, Barbados (cabeckles@yahoo.com)

Bryan Corbett (bryan.corbett@ualberta.ca)

Charlotte Maday (charlotte.maday@univ-paris-diderot.fr)

Juliane Mikoletzky (juliane.mikoletzky@tuwien.ac.at)

Eli Hjorth Reksten (eli.hjorth.reksten@liu.se)

Patricia Whatley (p.e.whatley@dundee.ac.uk)

 

*** Apologies for Cross Posting ***

Conference announcement: Call for Papers,

 

Democratising or privileging: the future of access to archives

 

25-26 April 2013

Apex Hotel, Dundee, Scotland

 

The Centre for Archive and Information Studies (CAIS) at the University of Dundee invites proposals for a conference being held on 25-26 April 2013. As patterns of access change and more archival materials and finding aids are placed online there is a perception that access is becoming more difficult. The conference will examine the extent to which that view varies according to user type and issues and trends relating to access to archives: on site, remotely and virtually.

 

The conference will bring together information professionals and a range of users; academic, professional and individual.

 

Proposals should relate to any of the sub-themes below:

 

  1. Online access to archives, the impact on traditional services
  2. Access to originals: are archive services fit for purpose?
  3. Selection for digitisation: criteria and impact on historical record
  4. Major commercial online resources for family history and the archival and research implications of what is missing
  5. Should different types of user be privileged?
  6. Location of collections: does it matter?
  7. Public History and wider policy issues: access and ethical issues
  8. What should users pay for?: changing models of charging
  9. Community and user participation in developing access to archives
  10. Who controls access to archives: closure and access to sensitive information?

 

Proposals for individual 20-30 minute presentations or panel sessions of up to three speakers will be considered and should be submitted by Friday 30 November 2012 to Patricia Whatley, Director, Centre for Archive and Information Studies at p.e.whatley@dundee.ac.uk.

 

All submissions must contain:

 

a) Title of submission

b) Conference sub-theme

c) Name of speaker(s)

d) Affiliation of speaker(s)

e) Address(es) of speakers(s)

f) E-mail address(es) of speaker(s)

g) Abstract (250-350 words)

h) Short biography containing employment, research interests, publications

i) Audio-visual equipment required

 

·         All abstracts should be submitted in English, checked for correct grammar and spelling and e-mailed in Microsoft Word format.

·         All submissions will be reviewed by the Conference Committee and those successful will be notified within two weeks after the deadline for submission .

·         Sponsored bursaries: A number of bursaries will be available, which will cover registration, accommodation and a contribution to travel costs. More details will be issued in the next few months.

·         Accepted presenters will be entitled to a 50% reduction in the registration fees (excluding conference dinner).

 

Target audience:

  • Archivists and other information specialists
  • Historians and other academics
  • Family historians
  • Museum curators
  • Policy makers
  • The media

 

Conference registration fees:

Full conference, including conference dinner – £95

Two days, conference only – £65

One day, conference only – £35

Conference dinner, Apex Hotel – £30

 

Accommodation and travel:

A limited number of rooms will be available at the Apex Hotel for conference delegates at the conference rate. In addition, a wide range of accommodation is available in Dundee close to the Apex Hotel.

 

Dundee is on the main east coast rail line from London. Direct daily flights from Dundee to  London City and Birmingham are available.

Sponsors and bursaries:

Conference sponsors include:

  • College of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Dundee
  • School of Humanities, University of Dundee
  • Dundee Convention Bureau
  • The Scottish Council on Archives
  • The Economic and Social History Society of Scotland

A range of conference bursaries are available for delegates and speakers. More information will be available on the conference web site in January.

Keynote speakers include:

  • Dr Caroline Shenton, Archivist and historian
  • Chris Paton, Genealogist and researcher
Call for Papers

International Academic Conference on Holocaust Research
University of Toronto
October 6-7, 2013

NEW SCHOLARS/NEW RESEARCH ON THE HOLOCAUST

Date:            October 6-7, 2013
Location:        University of Toronto
Sponsors:        Chancellor Rose and Ray Wolfe Chair of Holocaust Studies and
the Centre for Jewish Studies of the University of Toronto, and the Government
of Canada
Context:         Coinciding with the meeting of the Task Force for
International Cooperation on Holocaust Education, Remembrance, and Research
(ITF), an inter-governmental organization established in 1998 and meeting in
Toronto under the chairmanship of the Government of Canada.
Language:       English

Organized by the Chancellor Rose and Ray Wolfe Chair of Holocaust Studies and
the Centre for Jewish Studies at the University of Toronto, and the Government
of Canada, this international academic conference will showcase and consider
new Holocaust-related research by new scholars in the field.   By
“new scholars” the organizers have in mind advanced
doctoral candidates and those who have received doctoral degrees within the
past decade or so, but we will interpret these parameters flexibly. New
scholarship might include: comparative studies; topics that draw upon recently
released sources; gender, economic and religious and cultural aspects of the
Holocaust; local studies that impact wider interpretations; contributions of
media and literature to an understanding of the Holocaust; and other innovative
and/or interdisciplinary topics.

We plan to assemble researchers who have studied, thought and written about the
Holocaust from many different vantage points, in order to engage with one
another across disciplinary and national borders. Our Academic Advisory
Committee, co-chaired by Professors Doris Bergen and Michael Marrus, includes
Professors Alain Goldschlager, Irving Abella, Jennifer Evans, Dorota Glowacka,
Amanda Grzyb, Jan Grabowski, John-Paul Himka, Sara Horowitz, Robert Jan van
Pelt, and Dr. Naomi Azrieli.

We invite proposals to participate in this meeting.

The sponsors will cover expenses for travel and accommodation for those who
will be presenting papers. Our intention is to circulate papers to participants
beforehand for commentary and discussion.  Presenters will summarize their
papers at the meeting and all invitees will participate in critical discussion.

Kindly email your proposals, which should be no more than 300 words, together
with a short (max. 2-page) curriculum vitae, to Elizabeth McCann
(elizabeth.mccann@cic.gc.ca) before April 30, 2013.

Please write “ITF” in the subject line and attach your
proposal and c.v. as a combined file, preferably in pdf format. Applicants will
be notified by June 2013.

Stacy Hushion
PhD Candidate
Department of History
University of Toronto
stacy.hushion@mail.utoronto.ca

 

Library Closures

Library Closures

The following report has just been published by the House of Commons – Culture, Media and Sport Committee, namely `Library Closures:  HC 587, Third Report of Session 2012-13 – Volume I: Report, Together with Formal Minutes, Oral and Written Evidence.’

From the Report Summary:

‘Library Closures (HC 587)’ reports on how recent campaigns against the closure of local libraries have highlighted the strong attachment that many people feel to their library services; however, much of the focus of the campaigns has been on library branches rather than the question of preservation and possible enhancement of the library service.

Reductions in opening hours and the loss of professional staff may damage the service more than the closure of particular buildings. The provision of a library service is a statutory duty, but a number of councils have drawn up plans that fail to comply with the requirement to provide a comprehensive and efficient service.

A full assessment of the needs of the local population for the services is key; guidance on how to assess local needs does exist, but more must be done to disseminate it.

Although the future of public libraries may be uncertain there is an opportunity for the reassessment of their roles and how they are organised. The Committee saw many examples of innovative thinking about what libraries can offer to the local population, and a number of models of how those services might be provided. Councils which have transferred the running of libraries to community volunteers must continue to provide support, otherwise failure may be viewed as closures by stealth.

The Committee looks forward to the report due by the end of 2014, on the cumulative effect on library services as a result of the cuts in local authority provision, and the promotion of alternatives, such as the transfer to community volunteers.

[Download Full Report]
(Source: TSO Bookshop)

 

*** Apologies for Cross Posting ***

Archives and Records Association Annual Conference 

 

CARDIFF, Wales, United Kingdom

28th – 30th August 2013

 

CALL FOR PAPERS

 

Accountability, Culture and Ethics’

The Archives and Records Association UK & Ireland is pleased to announce a call for papers for the 2013 conference to be held in Cardiff, August 2013.

 

Records and archives play a key role in holding organisations to account and providing justice while also acting as an important educational and cultural resource. This conference will examine these different aspects of records and archives and the consequent roles and responsibilities of recordkeepers and conservators.

 

The conference will have two streams (archives and records management / conservation) but we will encourage crossovers between them. We welcome suggestions for papers, panels, case studies, debates and workshops on the following themes.

 

Archives and Records Management

  • Why do we keep records and archives and which of the following are priorities?
  • as evidence, to ensure accountability, to promote democracy and justice, and to protect people’s rights?
  • to create and protect identities and personal and societal memories, as an educational and cultural resource?
  • What are the responsibilities of archivists and records managers to their collections, stakeholders, institutions, and society?  Are they changing? Should we be keepers or activists? Whistleblowers?
  • Are there practical, moral and ethical tensions between these roles and responsibilities?
  • How can we contribute to accountability, social justice and culture in practice? Can we do this alone or do we need to acknowledge and form partnerships?
  • How can we ensure the reliability of our collections as evidence, particularly in a digital world increasingly reliant on social media and the Cloud?
  • Shred, delete or save? Does destruction erode trust? Should we bow to pressure to save less? If we save how do we balance access with privacy and confidentiality? What is the public interest?
  • Are we ourselves accountable? Is our profession diverse, do we promote equality? Are we educated and trained to behave ethically as contributors to accountability and culture?

Conservation

  • Do we have to accept compromise or should we work to the ideal?
  • Key ethical dilemmas: reversibility, removal of evidence, documentation, priorities and selection
  • Decision making: are we aiming to be accountable? for the greater good in society? to provide access to cultural material?
  • What should we know?: education and accreditation; research and development; the wider preservation world; new techniques and methods
  • Funding, partnerships and project successes: is money allocated in the right places? who is in control?
  • Are we entrenched in a digitisation culture, do we still care about original, first generation material?  What should we conserve?

The programme is flexible and session lengths will be decided once papers have been chosen but please note that individual speakers will generally have no longer than 30 minutes for their presentations.

 

Submitting your proposal:

 

Please submit your proposal, in the format suggested below, to:

 

Caroline Brown (Archives and Records Management stream)

Chair, ARA Conference 2013

c.z.brown@dundee.ac.uk

01382 388773

 

Mark Allen (Conservation stream)

mark_allen@flintshire.gov.uk

01244 532 364

 

The deadline for submission of proposals is:  17th December 2011.

Submissions will be considered by the Programme Sub-committee in December, and invitations to speak will be confirmed by the Committee by February 2012. Speakers will be reimbursed travel expenses and will receive free conference registration for the day on which they are speaking.

●             Try to connect your proposal to the theme of the conference as best you can. The theme is designed for speakers to bring topics to light that touch on contemporary issues

●             Try to be creative with your paper! How will your paper stimulate debate?

●             Please provide as full information as you can about your proposal – this helps the Committee in making choices about papers and scheduling of sessions

●             Try to be relevant and representative: consider looking at a topic from opposing viewpoints, or focus on the broader picture rather than institutionally specific ones

●             If you are considering making a group submission for a session, try to mix speakers from different backgrounds and institutions, or try to include a user or customer perspective

 

Your proposal should include the following:

 

-                      Name of proposer (or lead contact for group proposals)

-                      Institution

-                      Contact details

Address

Telephone

Email

Fax

-                      Submission title (or working title)

-                      Speakers (if a panel session)

-                      Session description (brief description, max 250 words)

-                      Special equipment needed (AV equipment etc)

-                      Any other information

 

For further information, or if you have any further questions, please

contact:

 

Caroline Brown

Chair, ARA Conference 2013

e-mail:  c.z.brown@dundee.ac.uk

phone: 01382 388773

 

We look forward to seeing you in Cardiff next year as a speaker or as a delegate!

 

 

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

The latest Table of Contents for the International Journal of Social Research Methodology, namely Volume 15, Issue 4, 2012, is now available online.  This is a special issue of the journal, investigating `Perspectives on working with archived textual and visual material in social research.’
This volume includes a number of interesting articles, including:

Dilemmas in Archiving Contemporary Material: the example of the British Library
By Jude England and Simone Bacchini.

Abstract: The dilemmas faced by institutions in archiving contemporary materials are exemplified by current practices at the British Library. With a growing collection aiming to be comprehensive and of use to researchers, tensions between selectivity and universality in acquisition are soon brought to the fore. Similarly, a sensible collection strategy must balance the demands of openness against the needs for privacy.

Link: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13645579.2012.687572

 

Recent Developments in Archiving Social research.
By Louise Corti.

Abstract:  Recent developments in archiving have built on a 50 year foundation of sharing social survey data and are enabling the take-up of data curation practices on a wider scale. Advances in data archiving have been driven by the quest for comparable and harmonised data sources and mandates from sponsors of research to make data accessible – to provide both transparency and to maximise re-use value. In this paper, I discuss four recent developments that are bringing challenges for social science data archives: methods for archiving qualitative data; providing safe access to disclosive data; institutional data archiving initiatives; and dealing with the emergence of ‘new’ data types.

Link: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13645579.2012.688310

 

Data and the Archives: The Internet as site and subject
By Fiona Gill and Catriona Elder

Abstract: The Internet has changed the nature of the archive from a paper-based treasure trove overseen by the trained archivist to one of an open, multi-vocal, democratic source with no one in control. New forms of archives have emerged – for example, the haphazard collection of ephemeral – and they now exist alongside the formal public record that has more traditionally been understood as the archive. This article analyses what these changes mean to social scientists working with data that emerge from or are stored on the Internet. Using a small case study based on our own research, we consider ways of thinking through and managing this challenge. We suggest this shift from the institutional to the intimate, from the state to the individual, from the public to the private has changed the way scholars access and interact with data.

Link:  http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13645579.2012.687595
For the full Table of Contents, Click on the Following Link:  http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tsrm20/15/4

 

Reblogged from Refugee Archives Blog:

Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post

Report on:

Beyond Borders: San Diego 2012 - the 76th Annual Meeting of the Society of American Archivists

During early August 2012, at the height of the Olympic glow in the East End of London where I live and work, it seemed almost surreal to be preparing myself for a trip to the West Coast of the United States in order to attend the…

Read more… 1,551 more words

Reblogged from Refugee Archives Blog:

Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
Launch of the Campaign for Voluntary Sector Archives House of Lords, Monday 15th October 2012

On Monday 15th October 2012 I was fortunate to be able to attend the Launch of the Campaign for Voluntary Sector Archives, (CVSA) at the House of Lords.  The Campaign launch was sponsored by Baroness Pitkeathley and funded by The Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund…

Read more… 1,021 more words

*** Apologies for Cross Posting ***

Comma, International Journal on Archives: Open Call for Papers 

Write an article for Comma and reach archivists around the world!

Following a number of thematic and regionally-focused volumes, submissions are now invited for  two general issues to be published in late 2013/2014.

Comma   has a global circulation, reaching professionals in more than 190 countries.  It publishes primarily in English and in French with abstracts provided in the seven ICA languages (English, French, Spanish, German, Russian, Mandarin, and Arabic). Submission should be of relevance to this international readership in terms of professional practice and/or theoretical developments or their application.  We also welcome comparative studies and articles relating to activity by international organizations (case studies relating to activities within one country will not usually be accepted).

Comma is not routinely peer-reviewed but the service is available on request and articles published after peer-review will be flagged as such.

There are two deadlines for submission: 30 June 2013 and 30 September 2013.  Prospective authors may wish to contact the Editor-in-Chief, Margaret Procter, mprocter@liv.ac.uk to discuss articles before submission.  Authors wishing to submit in French (or any other ICA language) will also be referred on to the relevant language/area member of the Editorial Board.

Guidelines for authors (French/English) can be found at                http://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/images/stories/documents/commafrench.doc  and               http://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/images/stories/documents/commaenglish.doc

Articles should be submitted, as e-mail attachments, to Mrs Nathalie Florent, florent@ica.org

*** Apologies for Cross Posting ***

Posted on behalf of the British Records Association

BRA Conference 2012

Jewels in the Crown? The Archives of Empire

This year’s conference will be held on Monday 10th December 2012 at the Swedenborg Society, Swedenborg House, 20/21 Bloomsbury Way, London WC1A 2TH.

The British empires affected millions of people across the world over four centuries, so what sort of records were created and where are they? What evidence has been kept and what destroyed? How do official records relate to the surviving unofficial and personal papers? What role have the custodians of records played and can the collections offer new insights for researchers in the 21st century? These are some of the issues our speakers, who are both archivists and historians, will discuss. The speakers are:

John Fisher, University of the West of England

Tom Lawson, University of Winchester

Lucy McCann, Bodleian Library of Commonwealth & African Studies at Rhodes House

Antonia Moon, British Library

Rachel Rowe, Smuts Librarian for South African and Commonwealth Studies, Cambridge

Terry Suthers MBE, Harewood House

We are delighted that The Maurice Bond Lecture this year will be given by Peter Hennessy, Lord Hennessy of Nympsfield, on ‘The Great Power Impulse; the pleasures and pains of archival research and on becoming an item at Kew’. As usual, this is a public lecture at the end of the day, open without charge to those who cannot manage to attend the other papers.

BRA Conferences are stimulating and informative; they afford an opportunity to step back and consider the nature and research value of  the archives we keep.  And there is time over a buffet lunch and refreshment breaks to discuss matters of common concern and interest.

The charge is £53 for members and £63 for non members of the BRA. There is also a discount rate of £26 for students and unwaged.

A full programme, further details and a registration form may be found on the BRA website at http://www.britishrecordsassociation.org.uk/forms/BRA2012Conferenceleafletdraft7.docx.pdf

Further information may be obtained from Maria Evans, Office Manager, 020 7833 0428, info@britishrecordsassociation.org.uk

Contact the list owner for assistance at ARCHIVES-NRA-request@JISCMAIL.AC.UK

For information about joining, leaving and suspending mail (eg during a holiday) see the list website at
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=archives-nra

 

*** Apologies for Cross Posting ***

Association of Canadian Archivists 2013 Annual Conference:

Community as Archives, Archives as Community

Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada

13 – 15 June 2013

 

Communities are the framework of our identities, our history and our lives. Online and offline, connected by geography, ethnicity, language, sexuality, interests, professions, friendship and kin, our lives are a lattice of communities.

 

Join us in Winnipeg, city of communities and meeting places, for an exploration of how archival consciousness arises in communities and how community consciousness has arisen among archivists. We invite proposals related to all areas of archival theory or practice and pertaining to any and all media. These contributions can come from anyone involved with archives: from archival staff and volunteers, from those who share an interest in archives, whether as a community organizer, researcher, creator, a professional or an academic, and from anyone who considers themselves to be a knowledge worker.

 

Topics might include:

  • Archives as Community: What issues are important to the Canadian archival community right now? How can we act together to achieve our goals?
  • Community Archives: What is a community archive? What is participatory archiving? How do we build collections and staff that are broadly representative of Canadian society?
  • Archives and Indigenous Communities: How can archival practice engage with Indigenous knowledge traditions? How can archives build healthy relationships with Canadian Indigenous communities?
  • Alternative Archives: Do certain communities treat archives in a particular way? How is the concept of “archives” reinterpreted (as a space, or as an idea)?
  • Virtual Communities, Virtual Archives: What are the challenges and opportunities of social media as collaborative tools? How do we create archives for digital natives? How can archives participate in open source and standards communities?

 

SUBMITTING PROPOSALS:

The 2013 Conference Program Committee invites contributions in a variety of traditional and nontraditional formats including:

 

1. Traditional session: formal presentation of papers; approximately 20 minutes per speaker, with questions to follow as time allows.

 

2. Panel discussion: abbreviated presentation of papers; approximately 10-15 minutes per speaker, with discussion to follow.

 

3. Roundtable: brief 5-7 minute presentations with open discussion

 

4. Focused Debate on a specific topic: brief presentations with open discussion & debate to follow. Can adhere to formal debating rules or not.

 

5. Pecha Kucha Session: 8-12 presenters have 20 slides, each shown for 20 seconds on a timer. Thus, each presenter has just 6 minutes and 40 seconds to explain their ideas.

Use the “Call for Submission” button on the ACA website at http://www.archivists.ca/.  Submitting your session proposal in electronic form using this link is strongly encouraged.

The deadline for these proposals isSaturday, September 29th, 2012

Note: Please be advised there will be a Call for Student Papers as well as a Call for Posters later this year, with submission deadlines early in 2013.

 

WORKSHOP PROPOSALS:

For 2013, ACA will use the “Call for Submission” button for any workshop proposals that will be associated with the Annual Conference; these submissions will go to the Professional Learning Committee, which will make its decisions in mid October 2012.

Workshop is defined as a full 1-day or 2-day event, generally combining presentations, group discussions and hands-on activities for a group of about 25 – 30 participants.  Workshops can cover any topic/subject, and may not be related directly to the conference theme.

Questions:

Please feel free to direct questions to:
Johanna Smith
Chair, ACA 2013 Conference Program
c/o Library and Archives Canada
550 blvd de la Cité
Gatineau, QC K1A 0N4
Telephone:  613-897-4742
Fax: 819-934-6800
johanna.smith@bac-lac.gc.ca

archivists.ca/content/annual-conference

 

Two recently published news articles further investigating the discovery of the Archives of the former Tunisian Government’s secret police.

Links to the News Stories as follows:

News story from the Archives Watch website detailing the opening of the Human Rights Documentation Center and Archive in South Korea. Link to the News Story – Seoul Opens North Korea Human Rights Documentation Center and Archive.

Full Text:-

Korea establish its first archive of human rights abuses in the North.  The North Korea Human Rights Documentation Center and Archive was designed to mirror West Germany’s Salzgitter Center that was opened in 1961 and recorded cases of human rights abuses in East Germany during the Cold War.  The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of Korea in a plenary session passed the motion to establish the archive.  The archive will subsequently be housed in the headquarters of the NHRC.

News story from The Chronicle in South Africa detailing a lecture given by the South African Archivist Verne Harris.  Full details – Archivist notes Importance of South African History

Full Text:

Recording the past should primarily serve to question the present and look into the future, archivist Verne Harris said.

Harris, head of the Memory Programme at the Nelson Mandela Foundation’s Centre of Memory and Dialogue, spoke to approximately 30 people in the David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library Monday evening. Sponsored by Duke Libraries and the John Hope Franklin Humanities Institute, the event focused on what archiving has done for the wounded since apartheid in South Africa and what archiving can do for equality in the future. Harris previously served as the director of the South African History Archive, an independent human rights nongovernmental organization.

“The discourses of modernity too readily assume that constructions of the past are about learning from the mistakes of that past,” Harris said. “Societies, and individuals possibly as well, very much learn not from the past but from the future—what we perceive to be the future opening for us, what we experience as our participation in the making of that future.”

Harris said the function of the Memory Programme is to properly document and secure all relevant historical information in South Africa and, most importantly, make it accessible to South Africa’s people. This will allow South Africans to preserve the memory of Nelson Mandela, the first South African president elected in a full democratic election, Harris added.

South Africa still has a lot of healing to do from the damage of apartheid and its aftermath, he noted.

“South Africa, by most measures, remains one of the most unequal societies on earth,” Harris said. “Liberation has reached too small a population of South Africans.”

Harris mentioned Mandela’s permanent retirement and weakening physical condition, emphasizing the urgency of preserving the memory of Mandela in constructing a future for South Africa.

“How do we learn to live without Nelson Mandela?” Harris said at the event.

Harris said this is a question that has not yet been answered. He spoke about the role of archiving and the Memory Programme in encouraging thoughtful dialogue rather than producing concrete answers to present problems.

Mandela requested that the Memory Programme not depend on him, Harris said, adding that Mandela asked not to be protected or sanctified by the archives.

“People feel that [Mandela] is already gone,” Harris said. “If we look to the future, the past will look after itself.”

Harris’ notion of a folded timeline through archiving struck a chord with Ariel Dorfman, distinguished professor of literature at Duke.

“We are privileged to have an extraordinary library here at Duke,” Dorfman said. “Those who do not know the past well are not only condemned to repeat the mistakes of the past, but they will not befriend it. To befriend the past, in some sense, is to create the future.”

Jennifer Thompson, research services and collection development librarian at the John Hope Franklin Research Center, noted the variety between archives.

“No collection is the same. You have to treat them differently and with different care,” Thompson said, adding that the diversity of archives primarily facilitates informed decision-making for the future.

Dorfman said the need to preserve the past is an act of self-preservation.

“If past papers are dead,” he said, “the papers that we are writing now will be dead tomorrow.”

Copyright: The Daily Texan

Copyright: The Daily Texan

New from The Daily Texan, produced in conjunction with the University of Texis at Austin detailing the launch of an important new digital archive concerned with the National Police of Guatemala.

Link to Full Article on The Daily Texan – Digital archive of Guatemala’s police force launched at conference

Full Text of the Article:

A digital archive featuring millions of images and documents from the National Police of Guatemala could help people searching for family and friends who have disappeared, said Karen Engle, law professor and co-director and founder of the Rapoport Center for Human Rights and Justice.

The Rapoport Center, the Teresa Lozano Long Institute of Latin American Studies and UT Libraries hosted a conference where panelists discussed a wide-range of topics, such as how the use of the archive has helped with the progress of human rights cases and research in Guatemala.

Engle said the information in the archive became public in 2009 when Guatemala passed a freedom of information law, and on Friday the UT Libraries made much of the archive available online.

The archive’s coordinator, Gustavo Meoño, created the archive from a warehouse of decomposing documents at the national police headquarters that was found more than six years ago in Guatemala City. The warehouse’s existence had been denied by the country’s government and police force, according to UT’s website.

Now, Meoño and his team have transformed these documents into a world-class archive that chronicles the history of the national police for the past 100 years.

He said this archive has helped and will continue to help uncover the history of Guatemala, specifically the time period of 1975-1985, when the majority of human rights violations were committed during the country’s civil war.

“The archive is fundamental for criminal investigations and persecutions in Guatemala,” Meoño said. “Historical, cultural and sociological investigations can all be stemmed to the archive and can advance the transition of justice.”

The archive is currently comprised of approximately 80 million images and documents, and about 13 million are already digitized and available on the archive’s website.

Christian Kelleher, archivist for the Benson Latin American Collection and project manager for the Human Rights Documentation Initiative, led the presentation of the website.

Kelleher navigated the audience through the website’s structure and discussed how to go about searching for documents and viewing them.

“We tried to make the experience of using this online archive as close to the experience of someone using the original archive itself.” Kelleher said. “There’s very limited indexing that can lead to direct access to the document, so identifying any material or looking for any document takes a lot of work to find.”

Charles Hale, director of the Teresa Lozano Long Institute of Latin American Studies and Benson Latin American Collection, said students could find the archive valuable for many purposes.

“Students can learn how to navigate large data sets, explore the complexities of Guatemalan history — deeply intertwined with that of our country — and work in support of initiatives in Guatemala to protect human rights, bring perpetrators to justice and build a more just and democratic society,” Hale said.

ICA Human Rights Working GroupICA Human Rights Working Group

The International Council on Archives Human Rights Working Group has recently published the December 2011 edition of their newsletter on their website.  The December 2011 can be downloaded – [here].

The Human Rights Working Group disseminates information on the importance of archives to defend human rights and the use of archives in protesting the violations of human rights. It issues a monthly newsletter on archives and human rights, it develops projects to increase the cooperation between ICA and archival services and administrations in the field of human rights, and it supports better and wider use of the archives in the defense of human rights.

An archives of newsletters from April 2008 is also available from the website – [here].

From the Moving Image Archive News site,  an article detaling the attempts by the Iriba Center for Multimedia Heritage in Kigali to document the history of Rwanda from the start of colonial rule through to the present.

The Audio-Visual Record of a Brutalized nation

Rwanda has been far from alone in experiencing the horrors of genocide during the last several decades. The world has often turned away from sights almost too horrendous to contemplate or imagine.

But in the African nation, citizens have been unable to close their eyes to what surrounded and assaulted them during the brief, brutal genocide of 1994.

That year, thousands of members of the majority Hutu ethnic group perpetrated vast massacres, targeting minority Tutsis as well as moderate Hutus. The killings were the bitter harvest of many years of tensions that governments and other powerbrokers within both ethnic groups had fomented. Also implicated, of course, were European colonizers, particularly Belgium, which by policy exacerbated ethnic divisions during the 19th and 20th centuries.

Full Article :

Copyright : The Hartford Courant
By KATHLEEN MEGAN, kmegan@courant.com  The Hartford Courant

9:49 p.m. EDT, October 11, 2011

When Mia Farrow first suggested that she videotape the traditions and rituals of the peoples from the Darfur region of the Sudan, refugee camp leaders were skeptical.

She said they asked her: “Will this bring us more food? Make the water cleaner? Bring us health care? Help us get home? … What good is this?”

But Farrow, the actor, humanitarian and Connecticut resident, promised to stand on the edge of the refugee camp every day for a month, ready to videotape a song or dance or any other custom if anyone was interested. At first it seemed that no one was.
“And then we heard the sound of drums beating and ululating. … We heard before we saw, maybe 2,000 people approaching, and they didn’t understand the concept of the limits of the camera, that we could only photograph within 6 feet,” Farrow said Monday in an interview. “They began setting up all around us.”

Farrow created 35 hours of video, documenting a culture that was in danger of being lost as the refugees — the victims of genocide, displaced from their homelands for years and suffering severe deprivations and illness in the camps — no longer performed rituals tied to the land or to celebration and joy.

Farrow taped demonstrations of farming methods, dances and song, children’s stories and wedding ceremonies, giving children who are growing up in the camps a chance to learn about their own heritage.

“Thank you for reminding us to remember,” Farrow recalled one camp leader telling her as the videotaping progressed.

“In my whole life, nothing struck my heart deeper,” Farrow said Monday, “than that one unadorned sentence.”

In early 2010, Farrow called the University of Connecticut to see if it might be interested in artifacts that had been given to her on her numerous trips to the Sudan, to Chad and to the region.

Valerie Love, who was then a human rights archivist at the university’s Thomas J. Dodd Research Center, remembers telling Farrow that the center wasn’t the right place for artifacts but that it would be very interested in her videos, photographs and journals.

An agreement was struck, and the Dodd Center now houses the collection of Farrow’s work related to her advocacy in Africa, especially in Darfur. It includes her documentation of the cultural traditions of the Darfuris and also personal stories of Darfuri people since the genocide began in 2003.

Farrow said that a visitor to a refugee camp first hears about deprivation — how much has been lost, how people haven’t had cooking oil or soap for months or years.

“The plastic sheeting that once covered them is now torn to shreds by the baking sun and the rains,” she said. Then they move on to describe how their lives have changed “dramatically and horrifyingly.”

Beyond that, though, are the recollections of what Darfuris’ ordinary life used to be like.

In a written account of her experience, Farrow said one community leader told her: “You know us very well. You know we are in mourning. We are suffering. We do not do these celebrations in the camps.”

This week, UConn posted a short video on YouTube, culled from Farrow’s collection, at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AN0CNcx4LDQ. A website, sudan.uconn.edu, also includes Farrow’s materials, as does Farrow’s own website, miafarrow.org.

Asked why she chose UConn, Farrow said Monday that she approached UConn on the advice of a friend who noted that she lives in Connecticut and asked, “Why wouldn’t you go there?”

Love, who no longer works at UConn, said, “She’s a Connecticut resident, she has a son who currently attends UConn, and we have a strong human rights program, so I think it was just a good fit.”

When she talked to Love, Farrow said, she was convinced that UConn’s Dodd Center was “absolutely the right place to put the archives,” partly because it would make the work available to many online.

Farrow said she wants people everywhere to be able to learn about this culture, but that she also especially wanted to create an archive so that Darfuris in the future can learn about their own heritage.

Betsy Pittman, university archivist at the Dodd Center, said that Farrow’s donation was “significant particularly … because this is an individual viewpoint of the atrocities and what’s going on in Darfur and Sudan in the hope of attracting attention. … We do have photojournalists’ collections, but she’s not a photojournalist. She’s not a documentary filmmaker. She is doing this because she is passionately concerned and she thinks others should be as well.”

Pittman said that Farrow’s work allows people to “go online and see some of these dances and conversations and songs, as well as stories of individual people. … It’s fabulous.”

A recent posting on the Archivists Watch blog provides a link to the video of renowned human rights archivist Trudy Huskump Peterson who appeared at the Wilson Center to discuss her last publication entitled Final Acts.

The Archivists Watch posting states :

“The Wilson Center ON DEMAND posted a video of Trudy’s appearance.  In it Trudy filters her expansive experiences in constructing, examining and improving archives all over the world with post-conflict trauma and regime change, largely related to cases in Egypt where destruction of archives has definitely occurred.  Trudy readily admits she is not so optimistic about reconciliation but believes in transformation and institutional reform.  She shares her views on the involvement and sometimes ostensible role of state archives in protecting violations of human rights and humanitarian law.  Trudy also discusses the different bodies of justice and courts which are currently supported by the work of archives worldwide.”

Relevant Links :

A fascinating story by Stephanie Hegarty of the BBC World Service describing the work undertaken by Sada Mire, who has been working almost single-handedly in Somalia and Somaliland to “uncover and preserve a cultural heritage that has been systematically looted, both in colonial times and mor erecently by warlords trading heritage for guns.”

Sada Mire : Uncovering Somalia’s Heritage

Sada Mire fled Somalia’s civil war as a child, and lived as a refugee in Sweden. But now she is back in the Horn of Africa as an archaeologist, making some incredible discoveries.

Sada Mire is only 35, but she has already revealed a dozen sites that could be candidates for Unesco world heritage status.

She has a fellowship in the department of art and archaeology at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London and is head of the department of antiquities in the breakaway territory of Somaliland, in the north-west region of Somalia. She is the only archaeologist working in the region.

Full Story :  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14592866

 

A news article originally published in Al Jazeera describes how Tunisian refugees in Paris discovered a secret archive formally owned by the deposed President Ben Ali’s political party, the Rally for Consititutional Democracy.

Links :

Tunisans discover secret archive in Paris
Yasmine Ryan
Posted 27 June 2011

In their quest to find a refuge from the streets of Paris, a group of Tunisian migrants have unwittingly become the centre of controversy.

They were amongst the thousands of Tunisians who fled economic and political uncertainty in their homeland early in the year, in the heady days after an uprising forced Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, the country’s former president, from power.

There are an estimated 600 Tunisians now living on the streets of the French capital, mostly from southern Tunisia, with little assistance from either the French authorities or their own government.

The French government has taken a hard line against these children of the revolution, with police playing cat-and-mouse, chasing them from camp to camp.

Angry migrants

A 30 year old man from the southern Tunisian town of Zarzis, who preferred to go by the name of Karim, told Al Jazeera how he took a boat to the Italian island of Lampadusa on February 10, then took a train to Paris after five days.

Since then, Karim says, he has not stopped moving from place to place in search of somewhere to spend the night.

“Now we are really in the sh*t,” he said.

Disillusioned, many want to return home, but have no way to buy a ticket back.

“There are many people who want to go back to Tunisia but have no support,” Ali Gargouri, a French-Tunisian activist who has lived in France for many years, told Al Jazeera. “The Tunisian embassy is doing nothing to help them.”

One particular group of recent migrants turned to what they thought would be a legitimate sleeping place. On May 31, around 30 Tunisians took up camp in an abandoned building that had been officially known as the Tunisian Cultural Centre.

They quickly discovered that the site at 36, rue Botzaris, in a northeastern neighbourhood of Paris, had in fact belonged to Ben Ali’s now disbanded political party, the Rally for Constitutional Democracy (RCD).

They had stumbled across thousands of pages of archives from the former ruling party.

The migrants found two rooms filled with photos, correspondence, financial records, lists of RCD members in France, information on Tunisian dissidents, along with files on French political figures and journalists, sources told Al Jazeera.

The documents, activists promise, could contain many explosive scandals, particularly when it comes to French politicians.

Gargouri told Al Jazeera that a committee has been created to decide on what should be done with the documents, which are drawing considerable interest from media. For now, their contents remain a mystery.

A week later, the French police evicted them – at the request of the Tunisian embassy. With nowhere else to go, the group returned to the former “Cultural Centre” a few hours after they had been forcibly removed.

Yet the Tunisian authorities, who had paid little attention to this building until the migrants moved in, persisted in their efforts to assert their ownership of this building, which had been owned privately.The state has effectively taken over RCD properties elsewhere, after a Tunisian court dissolved the former ruling party and liquidated its assets and funds in March.

According to a statement from the Tunisian embassy in Paris on June 9, the decision to expel the migrants was made because of acts of vandalism, violence and complaints from the neighbours.

Then, on June 16, French police officers returned, forcing the Tunisians out definitively.

The statement adds that, with its annexation of the building, it “benefits henceforth from the cover of diplomatic immunity”.

Embassy officials refused to offer further comment to Al Jazeera.

Knowledge could be power

Paul Da Silva, a French activist who lobbies for freedom of information, says that the documents contain explosive revelations about French ties with the former regime’s leading figures.

“That’s why we’re here, to remind everyone that French politicians have been complicit with Ben Ali,” he said.

Much of the RCD’s official records disappeared in the chaos that followed Ben Ali’s fall from power on January 14, with document-burning sprees reported in public buildings across the country.

For lawyers and activists, the document stash in Paris gives them a second chance to comb through the RCD’s activities.

There have been reports in French media that some of the files were sold, and commentators note that some of those aware of the archive have had months to remove sensitive material. Al Jazeera is unable to confirm these reports.

The only major French political party to speak out about the episode is Europe Ecology (EELV), which condemned France’s failure to support the migrants at a time when Tunisia has itself offered refugee to some 500,000 migrants fleeing the conflict in Libya.

“It’s surprising that the French authorities have devoted so many resources to the protection of buildings and archives belong to the old [Tunisian] regime and have showed so little concern about the lack of any humanitarian reception for the Tunisians,” Cécile Duflot, the Ecology party’s national secretary, said.
The discovery of the alleged archives has coincided with the opening of an investigation into Zine El Abidine Ben Ali’s assets in France.

With questions hanging over just how deep Tunisia’s political class is willing to dig into the alleged abuses and corruption that was so rife under the former regime, the documents could be a means for independent lawyers and activists to push for justice, whether in French or Tunisian courtrooms, on their own terms.

Ben Ali and his wife, Leila Trabelsi were found guilty in absentia of theft and of charges relating to the illegal possession of arms and jewelry a week ago. The former president and those close to him will face many more trials over extensive allegations in the weeks and months to come.

Complaints filed

Yet critics of the legal process say it is not going far enough, noting that the court dealt the first conviction during the trial in absentia lasted a mere 24 hours, leaving little opportunity for investigators to lay bare the bones of the regime. Activists argue that corruption extended well beyond the former president, and that knowing the truth is essential if Tunisia is to successfully make the transition to democracy.

“The Tunisian judiciary system is still not independent or unbiased,” Gargouri said. “People are focusing on the Ben Ali trial rather than looking too closely at the government that’s in power now.”

A judicial investigation targeting Ben Ali and the former Egyptian president, Hosni Moubarak, for money laundering allegations was opened in France on June 14.

As early as January 17, three organisations – the Arab Commission for Human Rights, SHERPA and Transparence International France – filed a complaint with the French public prosecutor urging a judicial inquiry into the assets held by the Ben Ali and Trabelsi families in France.

Myriam Svy, head of research at Transparency International France, told Al Jazeera that the French judicial authorities opened the investigation on June 9.

“Our objective is that a deep investigation is carried so that all the properties, all the money, can be returned to the Tunisian people,” Svy said.

The former Tunisian leader has issued a press release claiming he owns no property or bank accounts in France or any other foreign country.

Habib Essid, the Tunisian interior minister, visited Paris on June 15, the evening before the French authorities forcibly evicted the migrants from the former RCD property. No official reason was given for the visit and the Tunisian interior ministry did not respond to Al Jazeera’s queries regarding the reason for trip.

Since the eviction, the building – along with all the remaining documents – is under guard by a private security company 24 hours a day.

The Tunisian embassy chose to legally annex the building at 36, rue Botzaris on June 17 – a decision which throws a cloak of diplomatic immunity over the building, which means any remaining documents are effectively beyond the reach of the French legal system.

Ahead of the eviction, Gargouri and Soumaya Taboubi, French-Tunisian lawyer, transferred one-third of the documents to a “secure place”.

The activists removed well over 1,000 documents, Gargouri said, after some documents began disappearing.

Tip of the iceberg

As for the Tunisian migrants, they have been forced to scatter under continuing police pressure.

After their eviction, the group moved to the Buttes Chaumount Park across the street from the building. There, they faced daily visits from the police.

“The police are coming daily in unmarked cars to try to scare them,” Gargouri said. “It’s a question of intimidating and pressuring migrants.”

One night, it was teargas. Then their camp was destroyed by a squad of 50 police. On Wednesday, 22 Tunisians were arrested, only to be released within 24 hours.

A handful of French activists visited them daily, with some, including Paul Da Silva, spending several nights in the park.

Their case is but one example of how the French government’s approach to the unprecedented influx of migrants has been to turn up the repression, activists say.

According to the EU’s Frontex agency, more than 22,000 people were intercepted crossing into Italy from January to March, a 99 per cent increase on the number taking the same route in the same period last year.

In many ways, groups living on the streets are the lucky ones. Some 1,387 Libyan and Tunisian migrants drowned trying to make the trip to Europe between January and March, UNITED, a European NGO, told Al Jazeera.

Pascale Boistard, associate for integration and foreigners from outside the EU for the Paris city council, told Al Jazeera that France’s national government was neglecting its legal responsibility to assist the migrants.

Boistard argues that the Socialist-controlled city authorities are doing everything they can to help thousands of Tunisian migrants who travelled to France, including providing food and assistance to many of them.

The municipality has provided housing to some 310 of the recent Tunisian migrants, Boistard said, even though this is something the national government should be dealing with.

“It’s the state and the government that is doing nothing,” Boistard, a member of France’s Socialist Party, said.

“On April 22, we wrote to Claude Gueant [France’s interior minister and immigration minister] to alert him of the humanitarian situation. His response was to say that we should arrest the Tunisians.”

Gueant told the Paris municipal authorities that no assistance should be offered to the Tunisians migrants, because, according to him, they were in France illegally – including those who had been issued with temporary residency permits by the Italian authorities.

“We are in a situation where the migrants are constantly being arrested, then released immediately after,” Boistard said.

Boistard added that the government was ignoring an agreement President Nicolas Sarkozy had signed with Ben Ali in 2008, under which France agreed to offer assistance to 9,000 Tunisian migrants a year to help them return home.

Since January, the government has frozen the processing of repatriation requests, a move which is further exacerbating the humanitarian situation, Boistard told Al Jazeera.

In the interest of maintaining the government’s image as being “tough” on immigration, nothing is being done to help the migrants, she argued.

In the case of the Botzaris group, she denied that the municipal authorities had anything to do with the request to evict them. The decision was made either by police, or came via the interior ministry, she said.

“The Tunisians in the building were evicted at the request of the [Tunisian] embassy. We weren’t informed by the police that the eviction was going to take place.”

“I find that France is not living up to its history, and the values that it embodies,” she said.

Neither the immigration ministry or the interior ministry, both run by Gueant, responded to Al Jazeera’s requests for comment. The Paris police department also refused to comment.

Bertrand Delanoë, Paris’ Socialist mayor, has set aside $1.2mn for Tunisian migrants in Paris. Activists working with the Botzaris group, however, say they have yet to see this any of this emergency fund go towards supporting these migrants.

At the time of writing, no solution for accomadation has been found, and few French NGOs working with the homeless had showed up to offer assistance.

“The organistions say there’s still a problem and that the money is not enough,” explained Da Silva.

Politicians in Tunisia, busy preparing for the October election, have largely been silent on the plight of their compatriots.

“These political parties, they’ll be governing the country in a few months. Normally, they should be intervening with the French authorities on behalf of these migrants,” Gargouri said.

The Democratic Forum for Work and Freedoms (Ettakatol-FDTL), a leftwing Tunisian opposition party, questioned this explanation, calling on the Tunisian embassy to publically clarify “the real reasons for its eviction request”.

Mustapha Ben Jaafar, the party’s general-secretary, wrote to Sarkozy, saying that is was hard to understand why the young people, “neither delinquents or terrorists … should be hunted down like criminals and abuses simply because of their nationality, in a friendly country that has also told them that it was the birthplace of the Declaration of Human Rights”.

In contrast to the official indifference, a vibrant social media campaign has emerged in support of the “Botzaris” migrants.

Thanks to a handful of devoted activists, supporters have been able to follow Twitter and a website set up for the group for constant news, photos and video of the group’s difficulties and to respond to calls for solidarity or advice.

The conversation taking place on Twitter, under the hashtag #Botzaris36 was the second highest trending topic in France within days of the group’s eviction.

The nightly police raids have had their effect, however, and most of the group have abandoned their attempts to sleep in the shelter of the Buttes Chaumount Park.

“We’ve suffered many difficulties: with the police, the French state, even with the Tunisian state,” Karim said. “Now we must keeping going until the end, that’s all we can do. What other choice is there?”

Source: Al Jazeera

A news story detailing how the Commitee to Document the 25th of January revolution, a group of historians, archivists, and university professors) are working with the National Library and Archives of Egypt in order to attempt to document the events surrounding the Arab Spring revolution in Egypt.

This article was originally posted in AHRAMonline before being picked up by The Archival Platform.  The relevant links are as follows:

We will document Egypt’s revolution, not dictate the story: AUC professor

The head of a volunteer team doing the critical job of collecting the revolution’s documents to display to the public via high technology tells Ahram Online of a few of their glitches and ambitions
Posted by Mary Mourad, Saturday 28 May 2011

“This should be the best documented pivotal event in the history of Egypt,” Khaled Fahmy explained as he went on to describe the ambitious project sponsored by the National Library and Archives of Egypt Organisation whose large number of volunteer experts have one aim: documenting Egypt’s January 25 Revolution.

Fahmy, the former professor of history at New York University, current head of the history department at the American University in Cairo authored multiple books on Egypt’s history, including All the Pasha’s Men.

Fahmy explained that he was first called by Mohamed Saber Arab, head of Egypt’s national library and archives, around 20 February, soon after Mubarak stepped down, asking him to start planning to document the revolution.

“Egypt’s history is very poorly documented. As historians we struggle to find primary resources to guide us on some of the blank spots of history and eventually have to rely on secondary resources and memory,” Fahmy continued, “We want it to be different this time. This revolution is a turning point in Egypt’s history. We’re not changing a ruler; we’re changing the game itself, refusing to allow for a political leader that has no connection to the people on the ground and no longer accepting injustice and tyranny. “

The work began by forming a steering committee of historians, political scientists, anthropologists and IT experts. Out of this committee, eleven other smaller committees were formed to gather documents according to source of information: media, newspapers, NGOs, human rights organisations, political leaders, online material etc.

“We do not want to tell the story of the revolution,” Fahmy insisted and repeated many times, “We want to gather material that historians and scholars and simple people can then use to tell their versions of the story. The July [1952] revolution documentation failed for this reason: assigning one committee the task of writing what happened can only distort many parts of the picture. Until today, we cannot really tell what happened because all details – other than the official story – were lost. If we tried to prove or refute any of Hassanein Heikal’s statements, we would never be able to. We’re now trying to avoid all this by collecting everything we know, including oral testimonies, blogs, newspaper clippings, even Facebook status messages and tweets in order to make this a wide library resource for anyone studying the events.”

Fahmy explained that this is not an “authentication” project: “We have standard quality control over the materials: there’s a specific date, name (resource or person) and location attached to anything we share. But we do not conduct any investigations to prove it right or wrong. Does is sound horrendous? Well, newspapers themselves have been telling lies for years! It’s all part of the documentation and we have to accept it. Any scholar using the material will have to write clearly the resource and possibly try to follow it up.”

“We’re not the only people doing this effort,” Fahmy explained, referring to efforts by Bibliotheca Alexandrina, American University in Cairo and other independent bodies that are undertaking similar tasks, “But there are two major aspects that differentiate us: first, a focus on quality, and, second, a focus on the end-user. We’re not only concerned with collecting material, but also about storage, retrievability and accessibility in the future when technologies are upgraded. This concern is leading us to think a lot about what we are going to do with the material we gather. Our thoughts about how to divide, categorise, tag and link material are making up a lot of the effort.”

The final output is a website: no security clearance required and with open public access. “We need to make it accessible and attractive,” Fahmy explained, highlighting that the material will include many photos and videos in addition to the newspaper articles, reports, blogs etc.; all to be text-searchable.

Concerning the timeline of the project, Fahmy shared their latest conclusions: “We are considering starting with when Ben Ali [Tunisia’s president] stepped down until Mubarak’s trial for the period of documentation. But this may change! We’re in the middle of a very lively revolution and we have to stay flexible as we observe it develop.”

According to Fahmy, the value of the project is in that: “History belongs to people. Egyptians need to realise that it’s not the ruler who makes history, but their own every day actions do; by digging the dam, building the pyramids and by tilling their own soil. The revolution belongs to the people – not to the state. In addition, we hope that this project will reinstate Egyptians’ rights: their state is answerable to them! They have the right to know, and information should be made available and accessible – not become a sacred right for the [sole] use of the state. We hope this project will help encourage further disclosure and return the archives to their true owners: the citizens.”

Ahmed Gharbeya leads the information technology effort behind this project: “We’re trying to get more creative this time. The old archiving systems used by the national library and archives is quite outdated and not particularly user-friendly. We’re looking into new, web-based systems that enable easy access and are not necessarily more expensive.”

According to Gharbeya, and echoing Khaled Fahmy’s concern, the real challenge lies in categorising and enabling easy and logical retrieval of the information, which is not only an effort in technology, but also in the thinking behind the project. “We tried to learn from the similar projects such as AUC’s, to avoid mistakes and try to link with others. But we have other problems.”

Money and time are the two major challenges. “We do not have a dedicated fund for the project; we’re all volunteers and we buy things with our own money as we need them,” Gharbeya explained, referring to recording and photography tools just purchased. “Little money is being donated for the website developers and to purchase the needed software or pay experts.”

“But I’m not too afraid,” Fahmy insisted, “I receive calls every day from people who are eager to volunteer and happy to offer some money, as well, to support the project.”

Yet, as time passes – already four months since the Ben Ali stepped down, which is the date the committee is gathering materials from – critical knowledge (memories) may be fading. “There are still many unknowns,” Hanya Sholkamy, professor of anthropology, explained during the volunteer training held on 26 May on the national library and archives premises: “We have to start and then solve problems as they come. The real challenge for this project is a logistical one.”

The ambitious project has, indeed, many obstacles along the way, not particularly different from the overall difficulties facing the country on the political, social and economic fronts: time, money and management. The hope lies in continuation of the efforts and a focus on the light at the end of the tunnel.”

 

Informative posting on the Archivists Watch blog which details the project being undertaken by the International Coalition of Sites of Conscience and the Institute for the Study of Human Rights at Columbia University in regard to the Guantanamo Public Memory Project.  The project aims to preserve a public memory of the Guantanamo Bay site and to date, the peocject has:

mapped over 1,000 resources on the history of Guantánamo – from books to video footage to art to oral histories – and the archives, organizations and individuals around the world who own them.

Full details can be found as follows:

A recent article from the The Daily Telegraph on the 14 September, 2011, which describes how the UK Border Agency may be unable to track down around 100,000 asylum seekers out of the 450,000 forgotten asylum cases, a backlog of asylum cases originally discovered five year ago. This articles deceibes how `98,000 [cases] have now been placed in a ‘controlled archive’ which means there is little chance of them being traced.”

Almost 100,000 lost asylum seekers may never be traced

Officials have been unable to trace one in five of the 450,000 forgotten asylum cases meaning they could remain in the UK forever.

The so-called legacy backlog of cases that were never completed was first discovered five years ago, with some dating back to the 1990s.

The Home Office promised to go through every file by the end of this summer.

That target was met but only because officials have concluded they cannot find 98,000 of them.

Full Article on The Telegraph website - http://tgr.ph/n9k7NE

 

A recent news story from the Human Rights Watch organisation, based in New York, details how recently discovered documents discovered in the Libyan capital of Tripoli, have been used to she dlight on possible human rights issues apparently concerning the level of cooperation between Western governments and the Libyan intelligence agencies in regard to the possible transfer of terrorism suspects.

The full news story (and link) is entitled:

Full text can be found here :

(New York) – Documents recently discovered by Human Rights Watch in Tripoli reveal new details of the high level of cooperation among United States, United Kingdom, and Libyan intelligence agencies in the transfer of terrorism suspects, Human Rights Watch said today. The documents underscore the need for the US and UK to account for past abuses, Human Rights Watch said.

The documents, discovered on September 3, 2011, describe US offers to transfer, or render, at least four detainees from US to Libyan custody, one with the active participation of the UK; US requests for detention and interrogation of other suspects; UK requests for information about terrorism suspects; and the sharing of information about Libyans living in the UK. This cooperation took place despite Libya’s extensive and widely known record of torture and other ill-treatment of detainees.

“The Tripoli documents show that the US sought promises of humane treatment from a government well known to practice torture,” said Peter Bouckaert, Emergencies director at Human Rights Watch. “Given Muammar Gaddafi’s record of torture and abuse, it would have been absurd for the US intelligence agencies to believe any assurances from his regime.”

The US rendition documents, drafted during the administration of President George W. Bush, show that the US sought so-called “diplomatic assurances” that detainees would be “treated humanely” following their transfer to Libya. The UK documents, drafted under the previous Labour government, show that the UK government took credit for involvement in one rendition, sent information about Libyans in the UK, and requested information from Libyan intelligence.

Research by Human Rights Watch, as well as the US State Department’s own documentation at the time, demonstrated a clear record of torture and other ill-treatment by Libyan detention authorities. Nevertheless, the UK entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Libya in October 2005, with Tripoli promising not to torture terrorism suspects sent from the UK. British courts in 2007 blocked returns of people to Libya under the MOU on the grounds that the suspects were at real risk of being tortured if they were sent back to Libya.

US, UK Policy and Practice
The Bush administration transferred more than 100 detainees to various countries from 2004 to 2006, including at least seven to Libya, for interrogation and subsequent detention. The US government was responsible for these people being held incommunicado and did not provide information on their fate or whereabouts, in violation of the international legal prohibition against enforced disappearances. The US is not known to have sent any detainees to Libya since 2007, and the administration of President Barack Obama has not reported any renditions to any country since taking office.

The Obama administration, however, has not precluded rendering detainees to countries where there is a substantial danger of torture. In such cases, the administration has said it would continue to take into account a country’s assurances that it will treat a detainee humanely after rendition by the US or transfer to a home country or third country upon release from US detention.

In the UK, despite adverse court rulings in the European Court of Human Rights and some British courts, the current coalition government has continued the use of diplomatic assurances, referred to as “deportation with assurances.”

“The US and UK need to renounce sending people to governments that practice torture,” Bouckaert said. “The experience of Libya ought to teach the US and UK what common sense should have told them from the start – that whatever cynical promises you may get, if you deliver prisoners to torturers, they will be tortured, and eventually the world will know it.”

Obligations and Accountability
Under the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (the “Convention against Torture”), which the US ratified in 1994 and the UK in 1988, no one is to be sent to a country where there are substantial grounds for believing that they might be tortured or mistreated. This obligation has been interpreted to require governments to provide a mechanism for people to challenge decisions to transfer them to another country.

The Convention against Torture also obligates countries to investigate credible allegations of torture and other ill-treatment, including complicity. However, despite overwhelming evidence of US government involvement at senior levels in the use of torture, and of US and UK complicity in torture in third countries, neither government has conducted sufficient investigations into the alleged conduct.
In the US, Attorney General Eric Holder appointed Assistant US Attorney John Durham to investigate detainee abuse but limited the investigation to “unauthorized” acts by US interrogators. Ultimately the Durham inquiry recommended that the Obama administration should pursue further criminal investigations in the abuse of only two detainees who died in US custody. The administration has ignored calls for investigations into the alleged torture and mistreatment of hundreds of other detainees while in US custody or rendered to third countries for abuse.

In the UK, the coalition government agreed in June 2010, given the evidence that had emerged of UK complicity in torture in Pakistan and elsewhere, to establish the “Detainee Inquiry” to examine UK involvement in rendition and complicity in overseas torture. The decision followed extensive advocacy efforts by Human Rights Watch and other organizations. The inquiry will begin after the completion of two related police investigations into alleged criminal conduct by British officials overseas. But the government forced the inquiry, in July 2011, to accept rules on disclosure and witness participation that deprive it of transparency. As a result, Human Rights Watch, along with other organizations and lawyers acting on behalf of detainees, withdrew their cooperation.

Prime Minister David Cameron told Parliament on September 5 that the Detainee Inquiry will also look at the fresh revelations about possible UK involvement in renditions to Libya and Gaddafi-era abuses. While an examination of the Libya allegations is crucial, the Detainee Inquiry’s defects make an effective investigation highly unlikely, unless the government changes the Inquiry’s protocol. An effective inquiry would require openness, with the final decision on publishing evidence made by an independent judge, and not the government itself.

“If the British government is serious about getting to the bottom of UK involvement in abuses against terrorism suspects, it needs to fix the Detainee Inquiry as a matter of urgency,” Bouckaert said.

Document Details
The documents discovered by Human Rights Watch in Tripoli include communications between the former Libyan intelligence chief, Musa Kusa, and the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the UK’s Secret Intelligence Service (commonly known as MI6), and German and other government intelligence agencies. Human Rights Watch discovered the documents while examining the Libyan government’s external security building in Tripoli, which had been abandoned by Gaddafi forces. The files in the archives contain, among other things, evidence of crimes committed during Gaddafi’s 42 years in power. Human Rights Watch only viewed several hundred of what appeared to be tens of thousands of documents in the building, photographing approximately 300 and leaving the originals in place.

Some of the documents contain information about CIA renditions of members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, which had sought since the 1990s to overthrow the Gaddafi government and played a key role in the current revolt in Libya.

One of the group’s members was Abdul Hakim Belhaj, now the rebel military commander in Tripoli. The documents, which refer to Belhaj by his pseudonym Abu Abdullah al-Sadiq, detail an offer by the CIA on March 6, 2004, to “rend[er]” Belhaj from Malaysia, where he had been detained, to Libya. In the memo, the CIA asked the Libyan government to ensure that Belhaj would be “treated humanely” and that the CIA would have access to him for questioning once he was in Libyan custody. The CIA transferred Belhaj to Libya around March 9, 2004.

Another document is a letter from a senior MI6 official to Musa Kusa congratulating him on the “safe arrival of Abu ‘Abd Allah Sadiq” and taking credit for Britain’s role in the rendition, which “was the least we could do for you and Libya.”

During a research mission to Libya in April 2009, Human Rights Watch interviewed Belhaj, who had been imprisoned by Libyan authorities in the notorious Abu Salim prison where 1,200 prisoners were massacred in 1996. He told Human Rights Watch that CIA agents had apprehended him and his wife, who he said was then six months pregnant, in Malaysia around March 3, 2004, and transferred him to Libya. Belhaj alleged that while he was detained by the CIA, agents questioned him about his alleged ties to al Qaeda – which he denied – and, among other things, stripped him naked, beat him, and hung him against a wall by one arm and then by one leg.

The public record makes clear that the US and UK governments were aware of the pervasive use of torture by Libyan authorities at the time they rendered detainees to the country. The US State Department’s 2004 Human Rights Country Report on Libya stated that:

Security personnel reportedly routinely tortured prisoners during interrogations or as punishment. Government agents reportedly detained and tortured foreign workers, particularly those from sub-Saharan Africa. Reports of torture were difficult to corroborate because many prisoners were held incommunicado.

Some of the reported methods of torture, according to the report, included: chaining prisoners to a wall for hours; clubbing; applying electric shock; applying corkscrews to the back; pouring lemon juice in open wounds; breaking fingers and allowing the joints to heal without medical care; suffocating with plastic bags; deprivation of food and water; hanging by the wrists; suspension from a pole inserted between the knees and elbows; cigarette burns; threats of being attacked by dogs; and beating on the soles of the feet.

The Tripoli documents also contain information about CIA renditions and cooperation with the Libyan government in detention in at least five other cases, with specific information including flight schedules and detailed questions that the CIA wanted the Libyans to ask the detainees. They also confirm that the CIA sent agents to interrogate some suspects in Libya after the US had transferred them to Libya.

One letter from the CIA states: “We are also eager to work with you in the questioning of the terrorist we recently rendered to your country.… I would like to send to Libya an additional two officers, and I would appreciate if they could have direct access to question this individual.”

Many of the documents Human Rights Watch examined were drafted during a period of political rapprochement between the US and UK and Libya, after Libya had agreed to end its nuclear weapons program and cooperate on intelligence matters.

Human Rights Watch could not confirm the authenticity of the documents, but they appear to corroborate previously known information about the CIA rendition program.

The CIA secret detention program was authorized under a classified September 17, 2001 presidential directive and remained in place until it was terminated by the Obama administration. Although it is not known exactly how many people the US transferred to other countries as part of its rendition program, investigations by the media and human rights groups and the declassification of certain documents have uncovered more than 100 cases.

Copyright : Human Rights Watch.

The BBC News Education and Family section section recently published an interesting story on `Looking back with the 168 rebels.’  This story describes how an international research project currently being undertaken by the University of Oxford’s History Department will endeavour to record first-hand accounts from the protesters who participated in the political protests which occurred in a number of European cities during 1968.

The project is entitled “Around 1968: Activism, Networks, Trajectories ” and the project’s database, now containing over 500 spoken testimonies from protesters all over Europe, is now open to the public.  The project is :

“based in Oxford’s Modern European History Research Centre (MEHRC) is considering 1968 as a historic moment between postwar austerity and the Thatcher-Reagan years. Its guiding themes are transnationalism and subjectivity: tracing the links between activists in different parts of Europe and collecting oral testimony which both models and subverts existing narratives.”

Further details can be found on the BBC new story and the Project website as follows:

BBC News Story :   Looking back with the 168 rebels

Project Website :  Around 1968: Activism, Networks, Trajectories

 

An interesting news story from the IBNLive news service in India which details how The Andrha Pradesh State Archive and Research Institute, (APSARI), is in danger of losing some of there most prescious archival materials.

News story in full : Ancient State Archives in danger of extinction.

Full text :

HYDERABAD :The Andhra Pradesh State Archive and Research Institute (APSARI), the only such centre in the State, is in danger of losing some of its most valuable archive- manuscripts, documents and books dating back to 1407 AD. Most of these historical chronicles are not only brittle, but also damaged.

“We have been asking the government to release funds to modernise the institute and digitise the archive. But the response has not been encouraging,” Zareena Parveen, APSARI, told Express. The archives are a treasure trove of information not just on the Nizams but also the British rulers, the Mughals and the Delhi Sultans.

The chronicles, running into lakhs of manuscripts, documents and thousands of books, are in different languages like Urdu, Arabic, English and Telugu.� “It is better to digitise all of them before they get damaged, because they are the only sources of research for the next generation,” pointed out V Ranga Raj, Deputy Director of APSARI.

Osmania University, History department, Prof V Ramakrishan Reddy echoes the same views. “There are thousands of books which must be digitised or they will be damaged forever. For example, the Industrial Census in The Nizam Dominion 1935-45, Agricultural Census and Kesava Iyengar’s Economic Investigations In The Hyderabad State 1939, must be digitised� because they are very important to trace the economic and agriculture history of� the Nizam Government.”

The APSARI was reorganized by the National Archives of India in 1960s and collaborated with the National Mission for Manuscripts, New Delhi. But no development programme has been taken up so far,� Ramakrishna Reddy added.

The APSARI’s objectives are acquisition of non-current records from all the government departments, educational institutions and preserve valuable books, documents and manuscripts. The same will be made available to research scholars and all those interested.

I Sudarshana Rao, a researcher at the University of Hyderabad, who uses the archives, felt the historical data should be digitised and put on the Internet so that scholars across the world can access the information. The APSARI created its website in 2008 and updated the information twice in the same year.

Copyright : IBNLive.

 

A new report has recently been published by the Witness advocacy group based in Brooklyn, New York, which is entitled, “Cameras Everywhere: Current Challenges and Opportunities at the Intersection of Human Rights, Video and Technology.”  This report aims to consider the growing importance of video in the contemporary human rights activism.

Cameras Everywhere

Cameras Everywhere

I originally found the link to this work in The Documentalist, a human rights blog managed by the Center for Research Libraries-Global Resources Network.  The Center for Research Libraries is engaged in an 18 month “Human Rights Electronic Evidence Study” and the purpose of the project:

to survey the practices and technologies used by human rights groups, activists, and other organizations to create and collect electronic documentation of human rights abuses and violations, and describe how that documentation  supports advocacy, investigations, reporting, and legal proceedings on a local and international basis. The project will identify practices and create tools that can local and regional activities more effective.

“Cameras Everywhere”  was launched by WITNESS on September 6, 2011, with the key recommendations of the report being: “Long-term and sustainable change for the effective use of video for human rights requires genuine engagement between civil society, business and government to be impactful. We outline several key steps for technology companies and developers, investors, human rights organizations, funders and policy makers.”

WitnessPeter Gabriel, the musician and co-founder of WITNESS, stated that:

“This report asks the hard questions about how to protect and empower those who attempt to expose injustices through video. It provides specific recommendations for immediate and future actions that can reduce danger for those risking their lives. This report is an important step to understanding how we can harness the power of video and technology to empower activists to protect and defend human rights. This is the age of transformative technology.”

Relevant Links are as follows:

The Documentalist: http://crlgrn.wordpress.com/2011/09/16/cameras-everywhere-a-report-by-witness/

Witness : http://www.witness.org/cameras-everywhere/report-2011

 

A recent online article from Deutsche Welle detaling the decision to amend the law relating to the records of the State Security Service (Stasi) of the former German Democratic Party which would ban former Stasi employees from working with the Stasi archive.

Former Stasi employees to be banned from working with Stasi Archive

Deuttsche Welle article link – [here]
Archivists for Human Rights Watch blog re-posting – [here]

Germany’s government has agreed to ban former Stasi employees from working in the body which archives records from the former East German secret police. The planned change has been backed by the director of the authorty.

The law relating to the records of the State Security Service (Stasi) of the former German Democratic Republic is to be amended, the cultural spokesman for Germany’s Free Democratic Party said on Monday.

Reiner Deutschmann told the regional daily Mitteldeutsche Zeitung that Germany’s governing coalition had agreed to add a clause dictating that former Stasi employees are unable to work for the authority that now administers the files compiled by Communist East Germany’s secret police.

Under the new law, “anyone who officially or unofficially worked for the Stasi is not allowed to work for the authority,” Deutschmann told the paper.

It would also retrospectively apply to the 47 former Stasi workers currently working at the archive.

According to Mitteldeutsche Zeitung, the federal commissioner of the authority, Roland Jahn, has joined the Christian Democratic Union and FDP in advocating this change to the 1991 Stasi Records Act. Since taking the helm in March, Jahn has questioned the continued employment of former Stasi workers, claiming it undermines the credibility of the authority.

After several failed attempts at encouraging the employees to leave voluntarily, Jahn commissioned a report into the legality of their employment by the Berlin lawyer Johannes Weberling.

In the report published in July, Weberling recommend a change in the law, with the proviso that the former Stasi employees currently in the agency should be provided with “equivalent jobs [elsewhere] in the federal administration.”

Legality questioned

In his inaugeral speech Jahn demanded the transfer of the former Stasi employees

But the proposed change hasn’t been universally welcomed. Wolfgang Thierse, vice-president of the German parliament, told Mitteldeutsche Zeitung that he believed that a retrospective change in the law was “legally problematic.”

Social Democrat Thierse was one of the first inhabitants of the former GDR to take up a high-ranking position in reunified German politics.

Green party parliamentarian Wolfgang Wieland also queried the legality of altering the records law to dictate personnel changes.

“You can’t retrospectively dissolve an employment relationship,” Wieland said. “This is nonsense.”

“The law is there to determine how the files are administered,” he added.

The German government already has plans in place for an additional change to the law, allowing investigations into the possible Stasi past of senior public service workers to be extended until 2019.

At its peak, the East German secret police force employed around 274,000 people with an estimated 500,000 working as unpaid informers monitoring suspected enemies of the former communist German Democratic Republic.

Author: Charlotte Chelsom-Pill (AFP, dpa, epd)
Editor: Mark Hallam

Reblogged from Refugee Archives Blog:

Since the Woolwich murder, there have been worrying scenes and disturbances as the English Defence League has sought to become associated with Help the Heroes. Such political difficulties and controversies are nothing new to the voluntary sector. Offering some historical perspective, Peter Grant takes a look back to the activities of the Anti-German League during the First World War.

The horrific death of Drummer Lee Rigby has triggered a particularly unfortunate backlash from certain elements in British Society. 

Read more… 244 more words

Reblogged from Refugee Archives Blog:

After winning the Economic History Society Bursary to attend our summer conference, Emily Baughan writes for our June feature on The Save the Children Fund, the Geneva Declaration of the Rights of the Child and a Charter for Stateless Children, 1919-1940.

I am very grateful to the Voluntary Action History Society and the Economic History Society for a bursary which enables me to present my research at their upcoming conference in Huddersfield.

Read more… 399 more words

Reblogged from Refugee Archives Blog:

Voluntary Action History Society Fifth International Conference

University of Huddersfield

10-12 July 2013

Registration now open! Please follow the link to the University of Huddersfield Online Store to book.

Provisional Conference Timetable and Provisional Panel Sessions now available!

As you will see, some of our sessions are missing Chairs. If you would be interested in volunteering to chair one of the sessions, please contact Charlotte at:

Read more… 123 more words

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,666 other followers